Leave a comment

Comments 9

sambear August 27 2005, 16:26:01 UTC
Yeah, but.

Kinda sexy, too.

Reply


celticdragonfly August 27 2005, 18:26:39 UTC
Creepy and spooky. What's that for?

Reply

joyeuse13 August 27 2005, 18:27:28 UTC
Yet another elaboration of the unseelie faerie. :)

Reply


mrpsyklops August 27 2005, 21:19:11 UTC
Yeah, they are. How do they look from a reasonable viewing distance, considering the use?

Reply

joyeuse13 August 28 2005, 00:16:13 UTC
Hm? Considering what use? :-Z

Reply

mrpsyklops August 28 2005, 17:07:36 UTC
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I don't know if they're being used in a personal costume, a theater in the round production, or a stage play. A "reasonable viewing distance" might be three feet for the first, a couple dozen feet for the second, and anything up to an auditorium away for the third. They are creepy in the photo - do they read as creepy from the distance that the audience will view them?

Reply

joyeuse13 August 29 2005, 01:46:35 UTC
Ah. Well, they'll be worn for a masquerade costume, so I'll be on a stage, but people will see me in it close up too. We'll have to see.

Reply


benlanterman August 28 2005, 23:58:18 UTC
Joyce,, are they worn at the same time as the Dilbert hair :-)

Look closely at a wolf's ear. It has the cupped cone shape but is smooth and silky on the top side of the ear. The inner part of the front usually has a different color... if white on the backside-top then black on the inner cupped front side close to the skull. The black wolf ears I have seen are a gray in the inner part.

It might help the illusion.

Reply

joyeuse13 August 29 2005, 01:53:08 UTC
In 10 days, with a trip to plan for at the same time, this level of detail was not in the cards. This is not high art here.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up