Can I get a ruling on this?

Dec 26, 2009 22:46

What is the official ruling on when "slayer" is capitalized and when it is not? I see it rendered both ways, but I can't discern any real hard and fast rules about the circumstances that require one version instead of the other ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 27

rynogeny December 27 2009, 14:29:26 UTC
I think I'd vote with fluffernutter8 -- it's capitalized when referring to a specific Slayer, not capitalized when referring to slayers in general. "Of all the slayers who had ever lived, she was..."

Of course, you might get a different answer from me tomorrow. ;)

Reply

jen_nsync_landl December 27 2009, 14:33:33 UTC
Of course, you might get a different answer from me tomorrow. ;)

My problem exactly. ;) I must have ORDER! All of this variability makes my brain hurt. LOL

I so need to hunt down a Xander "Work, brain, work!" icon from "Something Blue" for these kinds of occasions. ;)

Reply


enigmaticblues December 27 2009, 15:53:00 UTC
I tend to capitalize "Slayer" when used as an address, but not as a descriptor, I believe. It's been a while, though, and I think I've moved towards capitalizing it less over the years. At this point, I think I'd capitalize it like you would "mom", as in your example above.

Reply

jen_nsync_landl December 27 2009, 16:04:17 UTC
I think I've also become more informal with it over the years, so there's not a lick of consistency in my fic. ;)

Reply


gigi_tastic December 27 2009, 19:17:59 UTC
I like to think of it this way: Slayer= name (like whats wrong Slayer?) offten used as a pet name by Spike for Buffy.
and on Gabs cooment aobut the Potentials... I always call then slayrettes. Buffy and by exstension Faith will always be Slayers.

and props for saying the Apocalypse is Night! *gives hug*

Reply


gigi_tastic December 27 2009, 19:18:38 UTC
ment nigh. god I'm such a bad typer.

Reply

jen_nsync_landl December 27 2009, 19:23:29 UTC
LOL I'm discovering that one of the joys of a Paid account on LJ is the ability to edit my comments to take care of my sloppy typing. And years of reading sixteenth-century manuscripts, when spelling was, let's just say, a *fluid* thing, has destroyed my former skills to identify misspellings. It's very vexing.

Thanks for chiming in!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up