on libel

[ialman]

so sam and piolo have dropped the P12-million libel case they filed against lolit solisi honestly think that if lolit's lawyer were even slightly brilliant, she would have won the case if the two guys she described as gay men pursued it. article 353 of the revised penal code defines libel as a public and malicious imputation of a vice, crime or

Comments

[anonymous]

I concur with your opinion, which is well-argued I might add. By writing this entry, you've somehow answered your own question: yes, I think you do miss the practice, or at least, the part that requires creativity in argumentation.-- ALT

[ialman]

true, i miss that part of the practice. but like i said, not all cases are like that. most of the time, they're highly routine, where you just go through the motions without inspiration and without being completely involved. i'm not sure if what i miss about law practice far outweighs what i don't miss at all about it. :D

thanks for the concurring opinion, my amici curiae!

[pisceantears]

You should have taken Sam and Piolo's case nala ng! Tapos sama natin sila sa bundok for more Broke Back moments! Hahaha. j/k

[ialman]

well why not? if they're up to it! the climbing, i mean, not the broke back moments! ingat, that statement might be considered libelous! haha.

[anonymous]

Oo nga, akala ko, it's like ally mcbeal or the practice. but i realized it's not.

[ialman]

yup, far from it. it's hardly exciting. :D