i wonder who among those who have complained the loudest about the cybercrime law have actually read it, and bothered to see how libel is defined by our revised penal code and how our courts have weighed the constitutional right to freedom of expression, and a person's right not to be pilloried in public. i wonder if any of them have bothered to ( Read more... )

so sam and piolo have dropped the P12-million libel case they filed against lolit solisi honestly think that if lolit's lawyer were even slightly brilliant, she would have won the case if the two guys she described as gay men pursued it. article 353 of the revised penal code defines libel as a public and malicious imputation of a vice, crime or ( Read more... )

last week, a few of my friends confronted me with an ethical issue involving online journals and the lives of other people. we very briefly discussed my own blog, and TJ was adamant that i should limit my weaves to my own strands and strings. "dapat ikuwento mo lang yung tungkol sayo. wag mo na idamay ang iba," he said. he was surprised how so many ( Read more... )