RE: if a statement missing logichojja_nusreddinJuly 25 2018, 16:06:29 UTC
My translation of yr stmt (possibly, inadequate) is: "If one of the plans of the UN was already in 2001, it is difficult to derive any conspiracy theory from the current reality"
My interpretation of yr stmt's translation: 1. if a "UN plan" existed in 2001 (so, u admitted that there WAS / COULD BE a "UN" = "illegitimate" plan), than 2. u are incapable to see any "conspiracy" (inspite of the admitted totally illegitimate "plan") 3. in its current implementation (and inspite of its implementation in front of yr own eyes) ________________________ I see a trivial contradiction here :)
Китайские учёные, занимающие ведущее положение в мировой науке, решают, наконец, реализовать мечты коммунистических вождей и меняют курс рек, по которым проходит граница с Россией. В течение одной ночи новые границы перемещаются на юг, и сразу 100 млн китайцев, живущих на территории, смежной с рашкой (ср. с 30 млн жителей российского Зауралья), оказываются в России. Тем самым Китай избегает кровопролития, которого они боятся со времён Даманского, получают возможность неограниченной экспансии на север, а Россия увеличивает свою территорию, невероятно подняв чувство собственного достоинства у среднего россиянина. Вин-вин.
China’s long history is defined by a recurring trope: 1. A strong dynasty emerges to unite the country in prosperity and governs until 2. the economic interests of the coast and the interior become so mismatched that 3. the country breaks down into civil war. 4. Chaos, regionalism and even foreign domination become the status quo until 1. a new movement arises to unite the Chinese people and reclaim the glory of Middle Kingdoms past
China’s future, then, boils down to a relatively simple question: Where is China currently in the cycle?- China has paid for that enrichment with inequality. A study by Peking University showed that as of 2014
( ... )
Comments 8
Reply
:)
Reply
Reply
"If one of the plans of the UN was already in 2001, it is difficult to derive any conspiracy theory from the current reality"
My interpretation of yr stmt's translation:
1. if a "UN plan" existed in 2001 (so, u admitted that there WAS / COULD BE a "UN" = "illegitimate" plan), than
2. u are incapable to see any "conspiracy" (inspite of the admitted totally illegitimate "plan")
3. in its current implementation (and inspite of its implementation in front of yr own eyes)
________________________
I see a trivial contradiction here
:)
Reply
Reply
1. A strong dynasty emerges to unite the country in prosperity and governs until
2. the economic interests of the coast and the interior become so mismatched that
3. the country breaks down into civil war.
4. Chaos, regionalism and even foreign domination become the status quo until
1. a new movement arises to unite the Chinese people and reclaim the glory of Middle Kingdoms past
China’s future, then, boils down to a relatively simple question: Where is China currently in the cycle?- China has paid for that enrichment with inequality. A study by Peking University showed that as of 2014 ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment