Concrit Post 16

[hmd_me]

How's My Driving?
∞ Comment with all the journals you RP with (and the communities they're from).
∞ Reply to other people's comments (anon or logged in) with constructive criticism.
∞ Learn from the suggestions and profit!

▶ Play nice! Flaming will not be tolerated, and threads with such will be deleted. Save the wank for anonmemearchive/roleplaysecrets▶ IP addresses are not

Comments

[whomever]

elegycity
koltaari ➡ imvi kol-doval ( star trek xi )

taxonomites
insideless ➡ rebecca locke ( the inside )
aeruginous ➡ gaila ( star trek xi )

museboxes & freeform
→ including dear_mun, sixwordstories, nexuses, others.
aspirinoracle ➡ cordelia chase ( angel )
immolating ➡ illyria ( angel )
drapetes ➡ winifred burkle ( angel )
hewed ➡ claire saunders ( dollhouse )
hairographied ➡ brittany ( glee )

→ full list
→ in before more activity: i'll be getting on that tonight. :)

[unsharedburden]

I don't know you. at all. But... Your Cordelia, Illyria, and Fred are all... Wonderful. Absolutely freaking... wonderful. I can't offer any crit for you on any of them. Fantastic.~

[whomever]

Aw, thank you very much! That's very sweet of you to say. ♥

[unsharedburden]

♥ You're welcome.~ Just being honest doll.

Gonna have to say your Fred is my favorite to read. Cannot lie.

[whomever]

That means a lot! I worry about bothering people 'cause I usually pick early S3 to play her from which means a lot of loosely-jointed rambling, so it's relief to hear someone finds it enjoyable rather than annoying!

THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT OF CON CRITS

[phonologic]

all of those usernames are amazing.

THEN BY GOD I WILL RESPOND ACCORDINGLY

[whomever]

I've taken some time to think about what you said, and while I agree with you on a number of points, I do think that for some of the issues it comes down to a matter of interpretation. However, I'll be sure to keep in mind all the issues you've brought up here, and try to implement some improvements in my future playing that will hopefully prove satisfying. Thank you so much for taking the time to help me develop. ♥

and did i mention thank you~?

I MIGHT BE LOLING RIGHT NOW. A+

[phonologic]

Word.

you're very welcome~ ♥

[purpion]

I haven't had the chance for my pup to interact with yours that much but from what I've seen of Imvi, I really liked. I would really like to see more of her when she's able to post.

[zarahjoyce]

...let me just start off by saying DAMNIT, WOMAN, YOU'RE AWESOME. I always love encountering Angel characters because there's not enough of them in the world, I believe, and the fact that you play them all so well is just. Brilliant. I adore your Fred so frickin' much, by the way ♥

[aztec]

I really hope you bring Imvi back to Elegy when you get some more time! I would've loved to see her interact with more characters.

[autophoenix]

Your characterization is all incredible and you're a joy to know ooc, but I feel like I can't rely on you to follow through on threads and stuff. I know we just play in SWS so there's no AC or anything, but I felt this way while we were at DDD too. I don't know if it's just trouble with your Gaila muse or what, which was my first assumption, but I've noticed inconsistency with getting tags back with Rebecca too. Idk. :C That's all I have to offer.

[whomever]

Well we... don't thread together very often, since I don't post much inside BNW and I feel you guys tend not to tag much outside of it (or maybe it's just me), so I don't think the sampling of threads you're referencing (taking only into account post-DDD ones because DDD is an entirely different set of issues for me that's game exclusive and thus not completely relevant to this reply) is really... an accurate snapshot of my ability to keep a thread going. Also it's that your style of play leans very heavily towards commentspam, which is great! But it's not my strength; I'm better at longer tags, and I get more absorbed in them, for a bevy of reasons that Rumi and I like tl;dr'd at each other about for at least an hour yesterday so, so they're not really worth outlining again; suffice it to say that my style of play is generally just so different that commentspam is less accessible to me than to the majority of people you're used to threading with, and while it's not really something I'm looking to change on the whole because I'm quite

[angelfood_cake]

Journal-hopping, I apologize

[whomever]

That and I don't make a whole ton of posts to SWS, so I can understand that. And... Darla isn't from the past, actually, she's from season two of Angel, between 2.01 and 2.09. And you're always free to tag ATS/BtVS characters with non-Buffyverse characters - I don't know if that's what you mean by saying you don't play Buffy characters but, yeah. And on the Cordy front, you're not shit with her but I can so relate on getting nowhere watching a show

[angelfood_cake]

Oh! I thought she was ... way back in the day human!Darla, I forgot she had a human stint even though I've ... seen that part of the series IDK where my brain was. And yeah I ... know I can tag them with other people, but finding things to say to them is hard when you're not playing a Whedonverse character, which is what I meant by not playing those characters.

;; Okay I just ... am an ukechan and took that the wrong way. ♥

I'm going to ... italicize stuff to make it clear what I'm talking about here because this is a big paragraph.

If you're not the official something or other, it feels like your interpretation is somehow less valid, and things like that in turn lead me to not want to make or mention threads/posts of mine.

I'm sorry that you feel like thiiiiis. ;; I admit I sometimes feel like that (I was worried about linking my Bela post in Dear_mun since Katie is our Bela, for example) but honestly everyone ... really respects each other's takes on the characters. Like, continuing my Katie example, we both play Elle and we