I think I've jabbered before about the media's unconscious response to people pointing out that it is structurally sexist, which is to portray middle class white males as essentially useless
( Read more... )
I have a theory that the uselessness is there as a deliberate placeholder for presumed audience members to identify with. It's a consequence of deliberate focus-grouping and marketeering and other unsavoury verbs.
Roadkill, OTOH, has not been subjected to any of those practices, and so is just about people and stuff.
Hm. So that would fit in with Furbish Louswort and the tyranny of lowered expectations, and some applied Dunning-Kreuger.
In that the tiresome become angry when shown pictures of competent people, so we can't possibly have that sort of thing because the tiresome and rugby-shirted are an important marketing demographic.
Maybe they could be distracted by a balloon on a stick that's had a face painted on it, with a voiceover telling jokes found in the bar at the last UKIP conference and someone making 'brmm! brmm!' noises.
Don't get me started on the uselessness. If I think about it too much, it's about a lot more than just what you've described.
I know I'm coming over all redneck survivalist, but uselessness is never, ever OK. In men or women. I mean, by any metric I care about I consider myself pretty damn bad at this being an adult business, physically and intellectually (and probably morally) lazy. And then I look at other people and - being useless and bad at happens, OK. Don't make it a badge of honour, though.
I believe there is a lot more to it, but I am a middle-class white male and I have been swimming in this shit so have only recently noticed.
Right. There's structural inequality and a whole slew of ableism-based malarkey, but the set of people not subject to those things are still crap? Jayzus...
By uselessness, I mean "look at me, I can't do this, I'm not even going to try, and that makes me superior and special" not genuine inability to do things. And part of it is a class/status thing, in the sense of "look at me, I can afford to be useless because someone else will come along and clean up my mess". Usually somebody more female, less white, definitely someone with less choice.
The interesting thing (to me, anyway) about the gamergate types is that they're all hopeless. I was rather surprised by that, because in the old days when computers were more rubbish, the gamey-gamey types were the ones with hand-built kit. GG can't even understand github, and yet they think they should have a say in how games are developed?
I suggest that a new party game called 'Who can watch CBS Reality the longest before throwing the telly out of the window' might be quite good drunken fun.
You'd need a supply of spare tellies and a tame glazier on speed-dial, mind.
I don't think I'm part of the target audience for "proper" car shows. Roadkill sounds good though. Like the good ole days of daisychaining Escorts together with gaffa tape and that squirty gasket stuff.
Comments 21
Roadkill, OTOH, has not been subjected to any of those practices, and so is just about people and stuff.
Reply
In that the tiresome become angry when shown pictures of competent people, so we can't possibly have that sort of thing because the tiresome and rugby-shirted are an important marketing demographic.
Maybe they could be distracted by a balloon on a stick that's had a face painted on it, with a voiceover telling jokes found in the bar at the last UKIP conference and someone making 'brmm! brmm!' noises.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I know I'm coming over all redneck survivalist, but uselessness is never, ever OK. In men or women. I mean, by any metric I care about I consider myself pretty damn bad at this being an adult business, physically and intellectually (and probably morally) lazy. And then I look at other people and - being useless and bad at happens, OK. Don't make it a badge of honour, though.
Reply
Right. There's structural inequality and a whole slew of ableism-based malarkey, but the set of people not subject to those things are still crap? Jayzus...
Reply
Reply
Yes. Class. Or at least affectation thereof.
The interesting thing (to me, anyway) about the gamergate types is that they're all hopeless. I was rather surprised by that, because in the old days when computers were more rubbish, the gamey-gamey types were the ones with hand-built kit. GG can't even understand github, and yet they think they should have a say in how games are developed?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
You'd need a supply of spare tellies and a tame glazier on speed-dial, mind.
Reply
Not that I know anything about cars *blinks*
Reply
Leave a comment