Golden Globes 2006 red carpet, baby!

Jan 17, 2006 11:57

Live red carpet coverage courtesy of e! No other option available in the UK, as far as I know.

Ryan Seacrest - mmmm. Okay, he's a presenter, but mmm.

My slightly edited thoughts on live proceedings. )

fashion, lots of comments, way too much spare time, awards

Leave a comment

Comments 60

snowking January 17 2006, 12:12:26 UTC
Kate Notinsale is auditioning for the White Witch?

Scarlett = Yummy.

Natalie = So cute like that.

Reply

majuran January 17 2006, 12:19:20 UTC
Natalie = So cute like that.

Hmm.

Reply

snowking January 17 2006, 12:20:44 UTC
Pixie!

Reply

majuran January 17 2006, 12:24:56 UTC
Ah, that cute! In which case, yes :)

Reply


majuran January 17 2006, 12:18:04 UTC
Really not fond of this whole plunge neck thing (I know not the fashionista term but ref: Lilly, Seymour, etc). On the other hand Swank seems to pull it off well. As always, the simplest dresses look the most elegant (imo, ref: Longoria, Johansson). Sarah Wayne Callies dress looks a lot like something Rose McGowan wore for an awards show at some point (I think). Suited the latter better.

Keira loffly as always usual.

Reply

hawleygriffen January 17 2006, 19:05:04 UTC
Keira appears to have been quite the hit. I'm trying imagine that Callies dress as looking good on someone but it just ain't workin'. Will have to dig out a link later. The plunge look could work if the women just admitted they needed support, so to speak.

Reply

ajr January 17 2006, 19:29:45 UTC
Really not fond of this whole plunge neck thing

Ah, Maj. You may be a Top Bloke, but you're also a Wronghead. Plunging necklines are great. Unless you mean to say that you're only against it when it doesn't work, in which case I suppose you're right there. But if you're against it in principle? Wronghead!

Reply

majuran January 17 2006, 20:58:26 UTC
you're only against it when it doesn't work

Well clearly if it worked I wouldn't be against it, e.g. Swank. Unfortunately most of the time it just looks... wrong. I think its when the design has the vesty bits that don't meet in the centre mostly. As in |_| bad, \/ good.

See now I've been thinking about this far too much. Damn you, ajr...

Reply


itchyfidget January 17 2006, 12:49:23 UTC
Eric Bana always looks good. Though I'm not digging the hair.

Reply

itchyfidget January 17 2006, 12:51:59 UTC
Also, fab frocks! Thanks for posting. Interesting how much red there was this year, and how much of it on pale ladies. Really liking Nicolette Sheridan's blue dress.

Reply

hawleygriffen January 17 2006, 12:55:26 UTC
To be fair, it looked better on telly.

Reply

itchyfidget January 17 2006, 12:58:29 UTC
Then I forgive him. He so delectable!

Reply


tinimaus January 17 2006, 14:07:24 UTC
Reese Witherspoon = EEEP
Mariah Carey = retch
Gwyneth Paltrow - Just because you are hatching another addition to the fruit bowl you didn't have to to cut up granny's old lace table cloths.
Keira Knightley - The guy is right - that does look too curtainish.

Nice going, Evie.

Reply

hawleygriffen January 17 2006, 19:52:43 UTC
Gwyneth Paltrow - Just because you are hatching another addition to the fruit bowl you didn't have to to cut up granny's old lace table cloths.

Perfect description there. :)

Keira Knightley - The guy is right - that does look too curtainish.

Heh. Hadn't really paid attention to the text, but now I'm seeing the dress in a different light.

Reply


immortalradical January 17 2006, 14:40:40 UTC
My detailed analysis:

No one can dress this year except Keira, apparently.

Reply

hawleygriffen January 17 2006, 19:07:45 UTC
.....

Very detailed indeed. One might say, exhaustive or wrong headed? Keira, just Keira? The dress looked good, it didn't look that good. Ah, well, at least your icon reminds me of Mal speaking in That Accent.

Reply

immortalradical January 17 2006, 19:36:50 UTC
Miss Sheridan and Miss Swank also had distinctive and stylish dresses. But most of the other efforts were either dull or aware that something was going on in this year's fashions but not quite sure exactly what.

Reply

hawleygriffen January 17 2006, 20:02:15 UTC
Swank, really? It looked a bit samey.

Perhaps the SAGs will be more pulled together.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up