This essay was published in my local paper today. I'm trying not to reply to it. I want to not reply to it. I do not want attention from the zombies. But, seriously, the replies are burning inside me. So I'll put them here. But first, the essay with only minor redaction.
----------
(
Greedy squirrels can be defeated by Occupy Wall Street philosophy! )
Comments 24
The squirrels in your story got rich because you kept feeding them. Just as the banks get rich when you borrow money from them, or when they get 2% of gross sales when you conveniently swipe your credit card, or 40 cents each time you swipe a debit card to buy three dollar's worth of milk: the banks - and the squirrels - get fat because they are good at getting what you are freely of your own will giving.
Perhaps the answer is to stop feeding them.
In economics we talk about "the invisible hand of the market" providing food where and when you wish to purchase it. I'm really unclear how you can mistake your very visible hand attached to your arm as a better distribution system, much less one that doesn't suffer from "centralized control of the resources." Where exactly was that birdseed coming from if not from one person who was in charge of buying and distributing it?
Please continue to share your wealth where-ever you desire. But I thought your theory was for the birds.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
but really, she should've just invested in a squirrel-proof feeder. or just let the wild animals forage for themselves...
http://youtu.be/gXM8Ri600HQ
Reply
Leave a comment