It's been a week since the election, and I've been following the events in California surrounding Proposition 8. I confess that I was unable to fully rejoice in Obama's election because of the votes in Florida, Arizona, and California banning gay marriage. If those states, with their thriving gay communities, are faced with such prejudice, what
(
Read more... )
Comments 28
One step forward, two steps back.
Reply
Reply
I'll admit, I'm glad it's not me who has to underwrite the legislation; but ultimately I believe in fairness for all people - I'll leave judgement up to God - and Prop 8 simply doesn't seem fair to me. If people are willing to commit to each other, then I say let them share the awesome and the awful of marriage and good luck to them!
My only requirement would be that any marriage celebrant - religious or civil - be permitted to draw their own lines about who they will or will not marry as their beliefs dictate.
Reply
Reply
Reply
ETA: My love for that icon knows no limit.
Reply
Reply
Reply
For some people the concept of calling it marriage is very important, and I understand that. There are religious reasons for it, and there are equality issues that play into it, as well. In an ideal world, it would be called marriage for everyone, and I agree that would be the best-case, most equitable solution. But I'm more concerned about getting the benefits than the semantics behind what they're called.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment