Re: obedientgirl

Aug 12, 2007 15:49

I filed a report with LJ Abuse, and this is the response I got from LJ:

Leave a comment

Comments 44

(The comment has been removed)

amokk August 12 2007, 20:48:32 UTC
They're kind of in the middle of their own fuckups recently, so I actually kind of hope they are a little gunshy about stuff lately.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

andrew_day August 12 2007, 21:07:18 UTC
That's because we're one of the last groups it's still acceptable to hate. We've still got "freak" status. Less so the middle-class white gays who just want to get married, but definitely the homos, queers, and trannies* who don't fit into that nice little cookie-cutter of "the gay and lesbian movement" that isn't too offensive to the white christian wealthy cisgender straight-appearing male elite.

* with whom I identify most

Reply


lady__delirium August 12 2007, 20:49:54 UTC
I'm pretty sure a few of those images did encourage harm to "social minorities". I didn't pay really close attention to the images but wasn't there like "DIE FAGGOTS" written on a lot of things? Then there was all the rampant misogyny. Media that promotes hate certainly should be in violation of their TOS.

Reply


equivocally_me August 12 2007, 21:06:36 UTC
What about the image where the woman is being fisted, apparently through the guts, until she pukes? You don't have to support us queers to have a problem with that.

Reply

equivocally_me August 12 2007, 21:08:51 UTC
Anyway, they also only defined hate speech as against three specific groups, which I found odd. Anybody remember what those were?

I think maybe race, religion, and..?

Reply

andrew_day August 12 2007, 21:10:05 UTC
ethnic group.

Reply

zorah August 12 2007, 21:19:54 UTC
...ethnic minority is the third. Apparently you can say anything hateful and violent based on gender/gender expression/sexual orientation and it is not hate speech. Nevermind that in a workplace or business it would be considered sexual harassment and creating a hostile environment and is illegal.

That image is pure woman-hate and I didn't choose to see it. It's sole purpose in being posted was to make women feel unsafe for the gratification of the poster. And I didn't consent to that.

Reply


ely_m August 12 2007, 21:29:35 UTC
take a look at her journal.
she have porn images.

http://obedientgirl.livejournal.com/

should report her for posting porn images on LJ in public

Reply


swallow_soma August 12 2007, 23:03:25 UTC
Yeah, that's happened before to stupid_free where we had someone posting graphic pictures of necrophiliac pedophile porn all over the place. Same response. LJAbuse is basically worthless, as the recent "fandom is bad, but pro-annorexia communities are totally awesome" thing.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up