fpb

A post at Fox News

Jan 12, 2010 05:23

I can't imagine what Sarah Palin thinks she's doing. If she is running for President, which I thought was certainly the case thus far, then I cannot see this as anything but a step backward; and not only because Fox News is a highly divisive outlet, but above all because I cannot remember a single case of a political commentator or journalist ever ( Read more... )

rupert murdoch, sarah palin

Leave a comment

Comments 22

dustthouart January 12 2010, 05:34:28 UTC
Al Franken and Mussolini. If Sarah Palin joins that pair, that would be really funny.

Reply


stigandnasty919 January 12 2010, 08:14:20 UTC
Palin said: "I am thrilled to be joining the great talent and management team at Fox News. It's wonderful to be part of a place that so values fair and balanced news."

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

From watching Greta Van Susteren's show recently, the only difference in having Sarah Palin join the network as a pundit, is that she will be paid for her contributions. It has become very much the Sarah Palin show.

Having her on Fox news will make her appear much more 'middle of the road and noderate' than she is currently perceived to be.

Beside Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck anyone would appear moderate.

Reply

fpb January 12 2010, 09:20:55 UTC
The trouble is that, even assuming she is still running, the only people who'll be watching her are those who are going to vote for her already. But at any rate, it is one thing to be a politician, and another to be a pundit. Walter Lipmann did not follow FD Roosevelt. Rush Limbaugh did not try to take over from the Bushes. There seems to me to be an inevitable difference in value and respect. And I hope she has enough to say; it's not easy for anyone to be lively and interesting once a week.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

stigandnasty919 January 13 2010, 17:46:49 UTC
I did wonder why her husband, a lifelong and apparantly committed Democrat had become so close to Palin. I wonder do they see her as a recruit, if not to Scientology then at least to the crusade against psychology and other sciences of the mind.

Reply


stigandnasty919 January 12 2010, 10:43:55 UTC
I have been wondering if Fox news, or elements within it, are close to abandoning the Republican party. And I have wondered the same about Sarah Palin.

Beck and Hannity, in particular, are no longer mainstream Republicans and the 'Tea Party' movement, which Fox has really been pushing, has all the hallmarks of a new political party.

Palin may prefer to be the big (only) voice in a minority party than one of many voices within a larger one. I get the feeling that the compromise required to lead a party like the Republicans, which is almost as broad a church as the Democrats, does not seem to me something Palin would be open to.

The tea party movement reminds me a little of the early days of the DUP, all it would take to turn the teaparty movement into a small, but significent party would be a charismatic leader. Palin fits that bill. Add a TV network and you have the start of something. Something that could grow quickly.

Reply

fpb January 12 2010, 10:48:54 UTC
That has been discussed in conservative ranks for months if not years. Most conservatives are sick to death of the heartless and contemptous way with which they are treated by the Republican elite. But I doubt they will leave. Look, rather, for a massive effort to impose new candidates wherever possible and to pack local and grassroots Republican organizations with True Believers. The Web is extraordinarily good for that kind of organized push, as the Democrats have already found out.

P.S.: there is some sort of law of the Medes and Persians whereby so-called conservative parties harvest the Christian vote only to treat it with unmitigated contempt, in the certainty that it cannot really go to their left allies. It is so with Mr.Cameron, so with Karl Rove's Republicans, so with the so-called Christian Democrats of Germany and Holland, and so with Mr.Berlusconi's alliance. A hard-faced rebellion against being used and abused might be no bad thing.

Reply


arhyalon January 12 2010, 14:17:44 UTC
I do not think she is running for president. Talk show host might fit her quite well though.

Reply

fpb January 12 2010, 14:24:54 UTC
Well, I posted at least twice on my belief that she was. Anyway, if she was, I think this will end it - not necessarily at one go, but cumulatively.

Reply

arhyalon January 12 2010, 15:08:06 UTC
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I think she might have been thinking of it at one time, but I don't think she is now. This is based partially on a long conversation with my friends from Alaska, who have a rather different view of her from what I had seen.

She does have a lot on her plate, with her large family and grandchild. Were I here, I would be looking at entering politics again ten or fifteen years from now, when her life is a bit simpler.

Reply

marielapin January 13 2010, 17:54:24 UTC
This was what I have been thinking. Why the rush? She has enough on her plate caring for her family and protecting them from all the fallout of the first election. A run for the presidency would put her family into even more tabloid hell scrutiny. She still has young children.

Reply


stigandnasty919 January 14 2010, 11:10:49 UTC
I watched Sarah Palin on the Glenn Beck show last night. A man who my father described as a little right-wing.... My father! Who reads the Daily Telegraph and the Mail on Sunday and is as Tory as Tory can be.

Even more convinced that this may be the start of a new right-wing group pushed by Fox News. You may be right Fabio, that it will be achieved through a takeover of the Republican party, or it may be a new party. Whatever happens the program last night was not in any way a new program.

It was polemic from start to finish.

Reply

fpb January 14 2010, 12:10:23 UTC
So this is Rupert Murdoch's latest political partnership. He built himself up with Margaret Thatcher, kept going with Tony Blair, and now he is out to buy an American party. You think we ought to warn the Americans? Mind you, if the bizarre mixture of Family Guy, pornographic reality shows, and the hysterical politics of Glenn Beck aren't enough to warn them, I doubt you or I could.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up