(Untitled)

Jul 30, 2007 14:13

It would seem that certain appearances here have spawned a very extensive debate on the topic of replication, fomicry, and the like. While everyone is prone to their own opinion, those with more ignorant notions of the fomic process and lives of replicas I would hope find themselves slightly less outspoken ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 54

notarikuclone July 30 2007, 18:19:01 UTC
What about those of us who are replicas?

Reply

fomicry_genius July 30 2007, 18:24:15 UTC
I do think I included that when I mentions 'the lives of'. Clearly, those of you who are represent an invaluable account of the living process....

No, rather--

The proof that replicas are not a separate species, nor the same individuals as their predecessors.

Reply

notarikuclone July 31 2007, 00:33:43 UTC
Ah, gotcha. Guess I missed that part.

So, uh, I noticed you and Nam were talking about me...

Reply

fomicry_genius July 31 2007, 00:36:02 UTC
In plainer terms, you were eavesdropping.

Reply


fomicryrose July 30 2007, 18:49:58 UTC
. . .

Yes, Jade?

Reply

[Screened] fomicry_genius July 30 2007, 18:51:07 UTC
You're in quite a spot of trouble, it would seem.

Reply

[Screened] fomicryrose July 30 2007, 19:16:54 UTC
And I'm sure you can tell this is why I'm not around. I personally, would not like to be any more involved than I am on this matter.

So, if you'll excuse me Jade...

Reply

Re: [Screened] fomicry_genius July 30 2007, 19:28:06 UTC
Ducking back into your hole, as usual? And here I was going to offer a solution...

Well, best of luck, then. Hopefully the Ghost will not follow your scraggly trail~

Reply


xxdrawnmemoryxx July 30 2007, 23:16:12 UTC
What is fomicry?

Reply

fomicry_genius July 30 2007, 23:22:00 UTC
As I told... Ryuu, is it?... ...It is the honed process of creating a perfect isofonic replica from original materials, utilizing the seventh fonon. That may come off as gibberish to you, in which case, you have my apologies.

Reply

xxdrawnmemoryxx July 30 2007, 23:27:12 UTC
No need to apologize.

So, it's creating a replica exactly like the original, basically? Interesting to hear how other worlds create replicas.

Reply

fomicry_genius July 30 2007, 23:29:18 UTC
With the seventh fonon, it does create an isofon; rather, a being with the same code or sequence of vibrations. All energy vibrates, and we are all made up of energies. However, perfect Isofons tend to be more than exactly like the original...

Mn. There is a different method in your world, I take-?

Reply


memorized_burn July 31 2007, 00:20:49 UTC
Doesn't fomicry have to do with ants or something?

Reply

fomicry_genius July 31 2007, 00:22:24 UTC
...Well, I suppose it could.

Reply

memorized_burn July 31 2007, 00:22:57 UTC
What is it?

Reply

fomicry_genius July 31 2007, 00:24:32 UTC
You tell me~

Reply


xdarkillusionx July 31 2007, 00:32:16 UTC
Hm, Jade...I believe you have knowledge of replication, yes? If so, would it be possible to examine the replica heart I had created?

I'm sure it would prove interesting, as it was made with the same data gathering methods as were used to create Ryuu.

Reply

fomicry_genius July 31 2007, 00:33:54 UTC
Allow me to clarify; you would like me to examine your own heart? In what fashion?

...And what methods might those be?

Reply

xdarkillusionx July 31 2007, 01:16:01 UTC
Ah, no. Prior to my death, I had removed the replica heart, as this world seems to have restored my real one, for now, at least.

Simple. I observed an actual heart, its functions, took note of its compositions of light and darkness and essentially used substitutions; recycled light and darkness, to be precise. Adding that to my own data, I was able to form a plausible copy.

It was somewhat simple, as, during my time as an apprentice, I spent much of my time studying the heart. Along with that, my master, Ansem the Wise, knew how to encrypt hearts as data and copy them as replicas.

It's probably far from similar to this fomicry...

Reply

fomicry_genius July 31 2007, 01:22:37 UTC
I doubt that they are dissimilar.

I also doubt that the 'heart' you refer to is the scientific brand.

All right. I will look at it. But at my leisure, and privately, on the additional condition that if I deem any information too... unnecessary to be passed on, it shall not be.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up