Leave a comment

Comments 20

salsburysteakjr April 25 2008, 15:26:48 UTC
Visually, having the lighting being so harsh and the color palette so bleached and yellow was kind of neat and different from every generic horror remake or sequel getting made these days, it's just a shame they forgot to include any of that "plot" or "character" or "worthwhile storytelling" stuff. I guess the director will work on that next time, maybe, if he can remember to.

Reply

hippo_crates April 26 2008, 13:51:46 UTC
There is a plot, characters and worthwhile storytelling. Just because there wasn't a scene entirely shot in slow motion with The Kinks or David Bowie playing in this film doesn't make it not worthwhile.

Reply

generic_madness April 27 2008, 14:03:54 UTC
LOL @ SHAMELESS DIRECT ATTACK

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

miss_yuka April 25 2008, 18:15:28 UTC
I thought The Hills Have Eyes 2 wasn't as bad, because I didn't care about the characters at all. I felt very sympathetic for the family in the first film, but the soldiers in the second didn't have any depth whatsoever, so I didn't mind them dying.

Reply


filmnoir April 25 2008, 17:14:19 UTC
This movie was so disgusting.

Reply


smith_smith April 25 2008, 19:48:26 UTC
It must suck for people who actually look like that.

Reply


adgy April 25 2008, 20:22:43 UTC
Alex Aja fucking rules.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up