Well, it looks like the pot has been stirred [up]!

Oct 25, 2005 08:35

Obviously, redindigo was onto something when she posted about heteronormativity and heterocentrism, at least judging from the 312 commentsSo, I'll risk appearing the angry, man-hating separatist dyke and attempt to move this conversation to the next level ( Read more... )

privilege, marriage, feminist mvmt asia, feminist mvmt south america, clothing, feminist mvmt africa, stereotyping, feminist mvmt north america, feminist mvmt general, relationships, lgbtiq, heterosexism, feminist mvmt europe, beauty and body image, dating, gender roles, sex and sexuality, feminist mvmt middle east, critique or criticisms

Leave a comment

Comments 119

redindigo October 25 2005, 15:45:48 UTC
thanks for posting this.

did you ever know that you're my hero?

Reply

chreebomb October 25 2005, 15:47:16 UTC
everything i would like to beeeeeeee

ditto, darling.

Reply


sunshyncat October 25 2005, 16:22:02 UTC
That shirt excludes me too. I don't like slumber parties.

Reply

chreebomb October 25 2005, 16:27:11 UTC
er...

??

Reply

sunshyncat October 25 2005, 16:36:01 UTC
Sorry... early morning humor gone bad... *sips coffee*

Reply

april_in_paris October 25 2005, 19:01:10 UTC
I got your joke. I chuckled fondly.
I was actually thinking the same thing once I read the whole line but it eventually morphed into "who would want to wear that?"
but my sense of humor died after I just failed a quiz in my last class and "witty" tshirts have rarely been my forte especially when they are mass produced and you pass by 6 people in a row wearing the same shirt.

Reply


naath October 25 2005, 17:40:50 UTC
I don't see how the shirt is inherantly 'wrong' - wrong for *you* yes, but not for everyone. If I saw a shirt that said "Red Sox are the best" I wouldn't get it - I don't care for $sport and I don't care for $team and I don't know who the Red Sox are... but some people do, and some people love them ( ... )

Reply

naath October 25 2005, 17:41:13 UTC
Also, yay for the information.

Reply

chreebomb October 25 2005, 17:46:45 UTC
you know, i realize you put a lot of time into this comment. but the point of this post was to provide a way for heterosexuals to become more familiar with the concepts of heteronormativity and heterocentrism.

you're already arguing in redindigo's original thread. so keep your disagreements in that thread, k?

thanks.

Reply

kahvi October 25 2005, 19:59:13 UTC
OK. So help this heterosexual. Is the heterocentrism that the store sells only 'het' shirts and not 'gay' shirts, or is it that the shirt described exists at all? I realize and agree that assuming that a potential buyer is heterosexual is wrong, but does that mean that shirts for heterosexual women should not be sold?

This might be somewhat off your intended topic, but I am genuinely looking for information and opinion on this.

Reply


dancing_moon October 25 2005, 18:12:45 UTC
Reposted from the earlier thread, with slightly edited language. I'm a sucker for flattery, no matter how small ;)Several people have tried. By picking one of those things and making it the default - and "couples" is currently by default woman + man in western society - we make all other choices abnormal, less worthy. By saying "heterosexual couples" the speakers are acknowledge that this is just one choice among several ( ... )

Reply

chreebomb October 25 2005, 18:18:47 UTC
oh thank you! :) mil beijos, amorzinho!

Reply

chreebomb October 25 2005, 18:40:29 UTC
amorzinha. sorry. :) you're a girl, yes? :)

Reply

dancing_moon October 25 2005, 19:12:43 UTC
Yep.

But I don't speak the language so I would never have noticed it ^^; (it's something latin-based, right? I want to say spanish but I'm not certain. Portugese?)

Reply


twowayaddiction October 25 2005, 18:46:49 UTC
Ugggggghhhh, you ROCK.

Seriously. I love you.

Reply

chreebomb October 25 2005, 18:49:26 UTC
i'm feelin' the love! so needed! thank you! 8-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up