(Untitled)

Sep 14, 2005 18:30

Before I delve, you ought to know that my school recently adopted a new, stricter dress code. One of the many things now banned are shirts that are blatantly discriminating or otherwise hurtful ( Read more... )

domestic violence, sexual assault and rape, clothing

Leave a comment

Comments 70

sophiaserpentia September 14 2005, 22:34:35 UTC
Sounds like "biting satire" to me. The sexist entitlement it mocks is certainly offensive.

Reply

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 22:37:44 UTC
I'm not sure if s/he was serious or not. But wearing that in school? I know some students who comes from abusive homes, and it just doesn't seem appropriate at all, satirical or not.

Reply

meow September 15 2005, 05:17:23 UTC
i agree and for that reason, i want that shirt!

Reply


robynchick September 14 2005, 22:38:05 UTC
Why would it matter his/her (etc.) sex? A crime, sexual or otherwise, is still a crime regardless of sex...

Reply

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 22:42:48 UTC
Just wondering if you'd find it more upsetting if a boy or girl wore the shirt. Just curiosity.

Reply

robynchick September 14 2005, 23:13:48 UTC
oh, I see what you meant. Equally upsetting then.

Reply

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 23:16:01 UTC
I had a feeling. Thank you for understanding. :)

Reply


evil_laugher September 14 2005, 22:45:54 UTC
It does sound like satire. I doubt if someone was being sued due to some domestic violence or whatever this is, they wouldn't advertise it on a t-shirt.

Reply

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 22:47:17 UTC
No, I don't think it was meant to signify a real-life lawsuit s/he was experiencing...I just think it was absurd to find it appropriate at all, since it clearly insinuates domestic abuse and manipulation.

Reply

smrtblnddiver September 14 2005, 22:53:21 UTC
Interesting, I didn't even think domestic violence when I read it (and I'm a DV volunteer). I thought rape. Man pressures woman to have sex with the "if you love, you will" mentality. Then she presses charges.

Reply

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 23:11:45 UTC
...And I didn't even consider that interpretation! I suppose that quote can work both ways. (Even so, icky.)

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 23:12:28 UTC
Exactly!

Reply

raevyyn September 14 2005, 23:57:13 UTC
In the US, the state presses charges against the abuser, so the victim (survivor) would never be able to drop the charges, even if she wanted to.

Reply

nuclearmse September 15 2005, 01:25:26 UTC
The state can choose to prosecute despite the wishes of the victim of any crime, but they grant crime victims some choice in many cases. And cases often fall apart when a victim of domestic violence or rape refuses to cooperate by testifying.

Reply


greenpuppy September 14 2005, 23:07:38 UTC
I'm not necessarily incredibly offended by it, but I don't think it's appropriate in a high school (which, I'm assuming by your age and the fact that there's a dress code, is what we're talking about). Just like I'm not offended by shirts promoting cigarettes or alchohol, but I think they are not appropriate in some environments.

If you see the person wearing it again, I'd suggest you draw the attention of a teacher to it.

Reply

notacrnflkgirl September 14 2005, 23:13:48 UTC
Yup, I'm a high school student. (Class of 2006, hooray!) I agree: Out on the street, or maybe even in a mall, I probably wouldn't feel the same. But knowing that it's an inner-city school with lots of children from violent homes...it kind of bugs me.

Reply

matcha September 15 2005, 06:19:00 UTC
I agree with this cause.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up