I decided that after all, I was a minarchist and not an anarchist. Let me explain.
A bigger government is where the proclaimed rulers have greater power, where public force is more positively correlated with their will, at their disposal to impose a less restricted subset of their commands, whims and desires on a wider set of topics and resources
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
Reply
Except for Joshua Norton the First, Emperor of the USA.
There are rulers in anarchy, indeed, just not everyone agrees on who they are at any given time. Bringing ethics to governance should focus onto reducing the encroachment between disagreeing views to zero.
As for negative incentives applied to actos of governing others... Marshall Sahlins made a career out of documenting the practices of "Big Men" in primitive societies, in which it is not the ordinary man who pays tribute to the big man, but rather the opposite: the Big Man is one who saves and then spends his own surplus of wealth to buy peaceful cooperation from others, as a method for funding public works (building communal houses, landscape forming, etc.).
So, there's subjective value in leading others. You'd criminalize that kind of mutually consensual transaction ?
Reply
I let it go to your having a bad day and able to laugh at yourself.
You would not initiate force against those who initiate force would you, seriously?
Your other writings so far as I have read are truly wonderful Free Friends proclamations and I am happy I have chanced upon you.
Come join my Free Friends Worldwide, love to have you, and also my Climbing Mount Maslow.
www.facebook.com/groups/ClimbingMountMaslow/
www.facebook.com/groups/FreeFriendsWorldwide/
I want to open a dialogue with you for it is so very very rare I meet a mind with values seemingly identical to mine.
Cheers, Jack in Santiago, Chile by end of this November to the New Land of Zeal for Liberty (aka New ZealLand, my dominain name!)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment