Comments | evwhore: Learn how to fuckin' make coffee, you fucking whore!

evwhore

Learn how to fuckin' make coffee, you fucking whore!

Mar 19, 2006 00:58

rmd posted recently about Harold & Kumar go to White Castle. The phrase "way better than it had any right to be" always seems to pop up in connection with that movie (check out the comments thread -- see?)

One of the other quasi-regulars in the Oaks $30-$60 (I haven't seen him lately, but I don't play frequently myself, and I did say quasi-regular) ( Read more... )

movies, harold & kumar, harry potter, poker, oaks, bay 101

Comments 8

rmd March 19 2006, 14:03:59 UTC

Supposedly, the folks behind H&K want (or at least wanted) to do a parallel movie with the two jewish guys, like "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" was for "Hamlet". Allegedly (that is, according to the imdb trivia page), this is why they're named something similar: Rosenberg and Goldstein.

rmd March 19 2006, 14:05:14 UTC

also, yay set over set.

Set-over-set alohamike March 19 2006, 15:50:18 UTC

What the hell did the cutoff have?

Also, what is "an S&M-ish" game? Lots of tops and bottoms? Sounds like a better description for a bridge game than a poker game.

Re: Set-over-set abostick59 March 19 2006, 17:48:57 UTC

No, it isn't whipartist's home game[1]; "S&M" here stands for Sklansky & Malmuth, authors of Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players, the bible on beating the $20-$40 game at the Mirage.

[1] Some pervy friends of mine run a nickel-ante home game that can quite accurately be described as an S&M-ish game, even though they think "pot odds" means the likelihood of getting busted when one is holding. They have a No Sharks Allowed rule, though, and I've never been invited to play.

Re: Set-over-set evwhore March 19 2006, 19:26:30 UTC

What the hell did the cutoff have?

Sure seems like aces, don't it?

Also, what is "an S&M-ish" game?

Fairly tough, aware players, most pots 2- or 3-handed for a raise or re-raise. It wasn't a great game, but this was the forced move and the main game looked better. It was mentally stimulating, and fun in a sick sort of way though.

abostick59 March 19 2006, 17:37:26 UTC

Cutoff had QQ; Zorak had 88, UTG had 55.

Cutoff alohamike March 20 2006, 01:02:51 UTC

Even if he's got QQ-AA, isn't he still nuts? Maybe I play too much no limit, but it seems like an easy laydown after all the action on the flop? Zorak, why does abostick59's photo look familiar to me . . . have we met?

Re: Cutoff evwhore March 20 2006, 07:21:18 UTC

Not to my knowledge.