I just read something on an online foster/adoption forum that just pisses me off. I do so hope I'm interpreting it the wrong way.
We have adopted three Jewish children (identical twins and a single) all with special needs. They are our "virtual triplets" as they are all 3 years old now. (Ironically, the children were all IVF pregnancies, by the
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
all i can think of, in defense of the biological parents, is that maybe they're "older parents" (which might explain the need for IVF) and they didn't think they would live long enough to care for their children (some special needs people need care their whole lives).
i think though, if i were in that situation, i would just make sure that other people in my family (my younger sisters, for example) were willing and able to help me out.
Reply
I'm not saying that people never do things for selfish reasons; I'm just not willing to assume that it's always that way.
Reply
if anything, and if this was the case (who really knows?), it shows that they were at least looking ahead to the future.
Reply
if anything, and if this was the case (who really knows?), it shows that they were at least looking ahead to the future.
I agree -- sometimes what is best for the child is heart-breaking for the parent.
Reply
Reply
Reply
My comment was inspired by my agreement/understanding of the frustration expressed with this statement:
You go through all that trouble to have a baby. You spend ALL that money to have a baby. You dedicate yourself to the rollercoaster that is fertility treatment. For what? To say, "Oh, I'm sorry, that baby isn't good enough, please take her away" in the end????
Reply
Or are you seeing enough of this sort of thing to believe otherwise? I wouldn't generalize too much from these two data points.
Reply
Reply
I think it's weird to consider that "selfishness." It's better to keep and raise a child you don't want? What kind of freak world is that?
I don't think having gone through IVF makes a difference when you're talking about whether or not to keep a special needs child. But then I've never gone through it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
That's how people dealt with "special needs" infants for generations.
Reply
I'd give it up for adoption, not fostering.
People have been learning to live with and love children that did not arrive according to our exact plans and specifications for generations now. So that would be the "freak world" that most of us are living in.
...piously says the woman who has absolutely NO special needs children. It's easy to tell others what they should do when you'll never have to do it, isn't it?
Nothing amuses me more than the easy manner with which every body settles the abundance of those who have a great deal less than themselves.
Reply
Leave a comment