Brutal honesty is not a virtue

Jun 28, 2009 21:32


Why does everyone seem to think that honesty MUST be brutal? Dears, it's not a requirement; nay, it's really only to be so in the most extreme of cases. The "nice, necessary, true" test doesn't include "nastiness for the sake of it." It's not something to be worn as a badge of honor; rather, it is something to be embarrassed by if it comes to ( Read more... )

just sayin', etiquette, friends, introspection, miss manners, life, observations, wtf?

Leave a comment

Comments 22

doniago June 29 2009, 01:42:20 UTC
Preaching to the choir here.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

doniago June 29 2009, 01:53:10 UTC
"Can't it be both?"

:)

Reply

esprix June 29 2009, 02:28:07 UTC
It *can* be. It *shouldn't* be, but it *can* be.

Reply

doniago June 29 2009, 02:35:07 UTC
I was aiming for levity there...

Reply


suba_al_hadid June 29 2009, 02:25:41 UTC
This. What you said.

Reply

esprix June 29 2009, 02:27:38 UTC
It dumbfounds me. Maybe it's because we have too much internet anonymity that people think they can get away with being that way.

Reply

suba_al_hadid June 29 2009, 02:45:59 UTC
Probably true - the internet is simultaneously more anonymous and more intimate, so it's easy to be more heart-to-heart. And more boot-to-pants too, as you observe.

Reply

esprix June 29 2009, 02:48:20 UTC
Just running into it more and more lately.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

esprix June 29 2009, 03:10:30 UTC
Hence the "nice, necessary, true" test I thank bovil for teaching me.

Reply

bovil June 29 2009, 23:49:21 UTC
I'll admit that I'm not really a stickler for the "nice" part if it's necessary and true.

I am a stickler for "necessary" and "true." If either of those don't apply, I'll keep my mouth shut.

"True" is easy-ish. "Necessary" is the complicated one. In some cases it may still be unethical to not say something, even if you know that it's not going to be helpful in the end. If it's not unethical to keep your mouth shut, and it won't improve the situation in the short or long term, it's probably not "necessary."

Reply

esprix June 30 2009, 14:10:30 UTC
Agreed that some people's necessary is highly subjective, but that's where the nice part ought to come in.

Personally, I think people should share nice, true things more often, even if they're unnecessary. :)

Reply


unclrashid June 29 2009, 03:53:37 UTC
Honestly, I wish you'd either spill the gossip or go and bitch at the person you are really mad at! I hate you LJ teases!!! I want the ugly details! (grin) (just kidding, you know I don't actually have patience for things like details!)

Reply

esprix June 29 2009, 03:59:06 UTC
Seriously. Who once told me not to bother with names if I didn't see them more than once? :P

Alas, no gossip. Just some thoughts after some conversations I've had recently. If it were about someone in particular, when have I ever been one not to name names? :) (Not that this *hasn't* applied to drama in my past, mind you, just nothing au courant.)

Reply

unclrashid June 29 2009, 04:26:18 UTC
Love that icon. I srsly need to expand my collection of icons. If our scanner worked I could make many!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up