I read
this blog entry the other night by link-hopping. (You know how it goes: you find an interesting blog post, which links to another post, which links to... It's like a hall of mirrors, and it can go on endlessly.) The point of that particular post is that people are overreacting to Twilight, and her thesis is that art (read: books, in this
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
So many coaches, not to mention self-help books, say that the stories we tell ourselves define us, that visions or narratives that portray us as successful help us succeed. I mean, why is "The Little Engine That Could" still a popular story for kids nearly a century after it first appeared? It stands to reason that the reverse is true, and narratives that ask us to identify with helplessness and passivity reinforce a sense of ourselves as helpless or passive?
While the romance genre has been shifting toward stories with more active, self-reliant and assertive heroines, I also see Twilight and Bella as a huge step backward for feminism. Of course, the fact that the author is a Mormon makes this less than surprising, but the enthusiasm for it, not only among teenagers but among their mothers, is really dispiriting.
Reply
If/when I become a parent, I will probably have to institute the same rule a friend did: no books Mom doesn't know anything about. It puts a heavy burden on the parent, but I'm not sure what the other option is.
Reply
I've even heard (indirectly; not any church I personally know about) of the books being promoted in churches. Bella doesn't have premarital sex! So they must be good!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(Also I am *beyond* grateful that they have Doctor Who, which has AWESOME female characters! ♥)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment