Comments | engulfed: dude where's my epitaph.

engulfed

dude where's my epitaph.

Oct 13, 2008 10:24

looks like i got lost in the realm of possibility! CAN I EVER BE FORGIVEN. now feel like a television & don't get to be entertained just wait to see what comes next have i ever mentioned how terrible i am at waiting. eat silence like a brick through your window someone's gotta forcefeed you REALITY. spoon-as-airplane style ladies & gentlemen lend ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

you anonymous October 23 2008, 02:34:45 UTC

you're a hag. and you're nuts.

heroin cat is omniscient heroin_cat November 5 2008, 03:02:59 UTC

what makes you THINK? oh right nothing

SCUM Manifesto: self loathing is not an art form orion_jeriko November 5 2008, 17:43:33 UTC

How transparent . . . another journal just to mislead people?

what's your next one gonna be?
Roid_DUDE?
y not stick with Rude_DUDE?

it's just beyond pathetic that you would make an entire sock puppet
just to seve as an egofeeder.

ref.: omg omg what happened to l1verworst?

Re: it's Solanis, Bozo, and you are still a Rebel witout a clue anonymous November 5 2008, 20:45:08 UTC

shut up shut up shut up
You really nedd to get a life

sometimes a cigar is just a cigar engulfed November 5 2008, 22:30:08 UTC

gotta protect myself from unwanted interventions & the perpetrators of such
compromised security is a big no-no
heroin_cat ate all the liverwurst see

Re: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar james_rhodes December 8 2008, 21:54:49 UTC

http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb02/newdata.html... )

(The comment has been removed)

Re: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar engulfed December 8 2008, 23:48:59 UTC

i honestly do not care who it is. i think the attention you are giving them is utterly grotesque & unnecessary, i did not have time to read all of this but want to reply to it so you don't decide i'm ignoring you & your Blazing Beacon of Truth or whatever. i'm not siding with anyone except myself more specifically my desire to keep this trash off my fucking livejournal. seriously if you want to argue with trolls do it elsewhere. as for "coming clean," what makes you think i know who it is? sorry if it's in the 7027584763708726702line comment above i have papers to write

My assumption was that you would read this and my motives are not driven by the need for attention james_rhodes December 9 2008, 02:10:18 UTC

"...Blazing Beacon of Truth..." Haha, that's funny, you made me laugh. Really? You think it's gross and unnecessary? I honestly wish I could ignore it too, and I don't want to argue with anyone, especially you, which is why I have ended up deleting practically all comments I have ever made to you. I don't want to argue with trolls which is why I repeatedly told him and her and the any other ones to cease all contact with me, which they, of course, ignored ( ... )

Re: My assumption was that you would read this and my motives are not driven by the need for attenti engulfed December 9 2008, 03:05:58 UTC

unfortunately on that matter they didn't technically initiate contact with you--they commented on my journal, which you also commented on, etc etc. unfortunately arguing with them only makes them post more, which is why i usually choose to ignore them
ip addresses don't really say much, either. i can track them to locations. most of these douchebags use some sort of redirection technique too as i'm sure none of the anonymous comments are coming from some of these locations
in review: responding to them gives them a reason to live. this is highly undesirable.

Re: My assumption was that you would read this and my motives are not driven by the need for attenti james_rhodes December 9 2008, 04:03:17 UTC

In the most recent one, yes, but on this and most of the others, I commented on your journal and exchanged a series of comments with you and they then directly commented to me with some sort of insipid, unintelligible nonsense. I try to ignore them, but I often feel compelled to do otherwise.
Yes I agree responding to them gives them satisfaction, but in not responding I feel that it gives the appearance of acquiescence and the illusion of validity to their comments that are not complete gibberish, but are ad hominem arguments instead.

Re: Well Yeah, but It's an Ultimately Fruitless Endeavor angrygraysmoke December 9 2008, 19:31:51 UTC

Yeah, I've gotten that too - people commenting on my comments on Helen's comments on someone else's commenting on etc. There's really no point in responding; neither you nor they are gonna cede any ground, especially since their whole raison d'etre is to get a rise out of someone without having to worry about consequences. While you're getting mad, they're getting off - perhaps literally. Some people live to get a rise out of others. (Of course, there are those who live to have a rise gotten out of them. I'm pretty sure that's one of the reasons why people like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage get such high ratings, even though their views are, in my opinion, abhorrant. But that's a complete tangent.) Of course, that's just my two cents, and I'm only inserting myself in here because it's a slow workday.

Re: Well Yeah, but It's an Ultimately Fruitless Endeavor james_rhodes December 10 2008, 02:28:09 UTC

I agree with you, and their/his self-esteem lies in tearing down people that are threatening to their fantasy world and egos bloated without warrant. It's hard to cede ground when you are in the right--actually in the right, and not in some delusional, grandiose twisted perversion of reality. Maybe they will O.D. someday soon and we won't hear from them again.

Back to all threads