people sitting around talking about politics: the fic

Jun 12, 2013 23:33

Basically, it's a compressed, talky version of the stuff that I was thinking through with my Lothíriel fic all those years ago. This isn't that, I just got to thinking about it when I came across a random reference, and considering where my Lothíriel might have gotten all those seditious ideas from. :)

title: princes of the city
fanverse: canon, more ( Read more... )

character: ivriniel, genre: fic, character: aragorn, fandom: middle-earth, character: imrahil, character: faramir, hi 2006 i've missed you

Leave a comment

Comments 8

anonymous June 13 2013, 11:20:46 UTC
You know, I always find it rather amusing when, in fics, Denethor/Faramir supporters call Aragorn "usurper". For generations, the Stewards of Gondor ruled the kingdom in the name of a King they didn't believe existed anymore and wouldn't accept if he ever did return. They didn't make a play for the "rights and dignities of a King" (partly because it would not be tolerated it, I would think), but they didn't seem to have any qualms about claiming the authority.

Reply

elizabeth_hoot June 13 2013, 16:21:14 UTC
Glad to amuse, I guess ( ... )

Reply

anonymous June 13 2013, 19:32:02 UTC
"Given that the king in question undoubtedly did die and was the last of his house, they were hardly mistaken to think he no longer existed. I do think it's questionable to assume that they wouldn't have accepted a valid heir of Anárion ( ... )

Reply

elizabeth_hoot June 14 2013, 02:33:09 UTC
I don't think it's questionable that the Stewards, claiming that they ruled only in the King's place, after a point in time did so safe in the knowledge that effectively they would rule Gondor till they died.

Okay? Yes, Mardil--the one who came to power when Eärnur disappeared--must have known that Eärnur wasn't coming back and he would be ruling in his place for the rest of his life. It was his duty to do so and, to go by his epithets, his assumption of power is in fact widely regarded as an act of faithfulness. And that's the only point I can think of where the actions of any Steward might have been considered a usurpation by Gondorians. The others simply inherited his established authority.

But how likely was it that a) there was an heir who had for some reason not appeared for centuries and b) that said heir could actually produce proof of his claim strong enough to convince Stewards who were probably very unwilling to be convinced?

It's canon that there weren't any valid heirs, thanks to the effects of the Kinstrife. So...?

... )

Reply


phyloxena June 13 2013, 16:05:13 UTC
Thank you for posting this! I missed your Tolkien fanfiction a lot.

Reply

elizabeth_hoot June 13 2013, 16:21:44 UTC
You're welcome! Thank you very much :)

Reply


bratfarrar July 27 2013, 23:53:56 UTC
*sighs happily* I could read an entire novel based off this: Imrahil, politics, no bashing of either Aragorn or the line of stewards....

I love the succinctness of the last line--so much in so few words.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up