Leave a comment

Comments 19

ainsley December 15 2008, 17:52:45 UTC
Oh, hai, person I've never heard of, who's apparently more famous than jflan, who I knew quite well before SGA.

I think I'll stick with Jack and John.

Reply

dtissagirl December 15 2008, 18:28:24 UTC
Wow, I'm impressed that you've never heard of Robert Carlyle. There was a time in the late '90s when he was in pretty much every single British movie made. [You've never seen Trainspotting?]

I haven't liked Sheppard since mid-S3, but I don't think there's any possible way they can come up with a character I'll love more than Jack. EVER.

Reply

ainsley December 15 2008, 19:02:13 UTC
I saw part of Trainspotting, but hated it and thus stopped watching (and banished it from my brain).

To be honest, I don't watch a lot of movies. While my ambitious goal for TV was 1000 episodes, for movies it was 26 (which I bet is twice what I managed in 2007). I'm fairly certain the last movie I saw in a theatre was in February 2007.

My Sheppard love waxes and wanes, and is in part due to jflan, but Jack is wonderful and I enjoy him more the more I watch of SG-1.

Reply

dtissagirl December 15 2008, 20:40:49 UTC
Hee. While I don't expect people to watch as many movies as I do [what with it actually being part of my job], I always forget that there are people who aren't really into movies. I just love everything about them. :)

I actually really love Flanigan, and I'm really hoping he gets himself another show so I can watch his hair every week. *g*

Reply


jujubinha December 15 2008, 20:40:24 UTC
Robert Carlyle does Stargate Universe.

Perhaps it's my current inability to give a crap about Atlantis, but I'm not excited AT ALL about Universe. I mean, I doubt we'll get special appearances from the SG-1 crew (wasn't it supposed to be set like, thousands of years before the other Stargates? What changed?), and HI ANCIENTS YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP, so yeah.

But that casting might just make me watch. You know I love me some Scottish accent - though I doubt said accent will be onscreen, but alas.

Another important thingy to be discussed, though? Jack's the important PoV in SG-1, and despite Mallozzi's fetich with McKay, Sheppard's the relevant PoV in Atlantis (or, at least, it was so). Now it seems that Universe will go science instead of military, yes?

So, like, this "change of heart" just reaffirm my hatred for the sacking of Weir, the civilian/DOCTOR leader os Atlantis. I *know* it's unrelated, but still. Ugh.

Reply

dtissagirl December 15 2008, 20:49:59 UTC
No no no, SGU is happening in present time. Where the hell did you get the idea about it being about ancients? What they have is an ancient *SHIP* in which the crew is trapped inside. But from all I've read, it's SGC [or some Alpha Site-like place?] people who accidentally gate to the ship.

At first I thought Carlyle had been cast for the Col Young part, but apparently yeah, the first lead is the scientist dude this time around. Still, this Dr Rush dude reads as a COMPLETE SOCIOPATH in every description I've read. Which, hi, perfect for Robert Carlyle to play. *g*

Reply

jujubinha December 15 2008, 21:00:55 UTC
I SWEAR I read it was about Ancients! Ancients coming to Earth in a ship. I SWEAR! I'm not inventing this - especially because I would have come up with something better. Perhaps I read it in the very early stages of what they were thinking to do with it. I don't know. I DON'T KNOW!

And I'm all for a flawed lead, even if it's a scientist flawed lead - as long as it's as far away from McKay as we can go, because talk about flawed scientist there.

Reply

dtissagirl December 15 2008, 21:14:20 UTC
There are no Ancients on the ship anymore, the Destiny is on a pre-programmed course to connect the whole Stargate network to the far reaches of the galaxy [or something like that]. The Ancients were supposed to use the ninth chevron to reach it, but they ascended instead and the ship kept going. This is from the official announcement for the show:

After unlocking the mystery of the Stargate's ninth chevron, a team of explorers travels to an unmanned starship called the Destiny, launched by the Ancients at the height of their civilization as a grand experiment set in motion, but never completed ( ... )

Reply


indiana_jane_ December 16 2008, 02:57:07 UTC
Thumbs up for the casting. Who knows how the show will be . . . coming from Trek fandom tv franchises can be dead horses which you can beat and beat and beat until there's little entertainment value left in them, and this premise sounds a wee bit Voyager-ish to me . . . but who knows. I always try to reserve judgement until I've seen it.

Reply

dtissagirl December 16 2008, 17:26:40 UTC
Well, it sounds like Voyager, Farscape, Firefly and Battlestar Galactica got together and went through an Stargate. *g*

Also, if there's one thing I *don't* expect the Stargate writers, it's originality. I just enjoy Brad Wright's sense of humor a lot more than I probably should and I'm happy he's gonna keep making shows that will cater to my exact comedic needs -- and without them actually being comedies, which is also very important to me. :)

Reply

indiana_jane_ December 22 2008, 18:27:05 UTC
That's a good point. I don't really expect originality from any Stargate series either. I expect to be entertained in a rather mindless fashion, get my sci-fi fix and you're correct about the humour.

I'm actually about to start renting SG-1! I've only ever seen SGA, and without school I'm going to have a lot of free time on my hands so I figured that'll occupy my tv-time for awhile.

Reply

dtissagirl December 23 2008, 01:17:04 UTC
Oh, I hope you like SG-1 -- I found it far superior than SGA, actually -- there's actual character development and they do seem to have a plan re: story-arcs. You just gotta stick around the first few seasons to get to the really good stuff [that being, in my opinion, seasons 4 and 6 and 8.]

Though I bet you're gonna end up being a Daniel girl and not a Jack girl like myself. Daniel's the archaeologist after all. :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up