Worth a Thousand Words

Sep 06, 2006 08:52

James Kent, in a 2006 article with the stunning citation "There is plenty of information online and in books," says "women talk for the sake of talking." It's possible that Kent is referring to the oft-quoted (and rarely cited) chestnut that men use 7,000 words per day whereas women use 20,000. Godwin Scerri uses this tidbit in his discussion of Read more... )

simon baron-cohen, s knecht, the female brain, fmri, talking, louann brizendine, godwin scerri, speech, amy welch, communication, men, tv, ftcd, autism, talk, women, james kent, paul rayson, conversation, maureen carlin

Leave a comment

Comments 11

astrogeek01 September 6 2006, 14:31:43 UTC
Huh. Does it happen with other women mostly in date-like settings, or in general?

Reply

differenceblog September 6 2006, 14:32:57 UTC
As far as I can recall, only in date-like settings. In fact, it largely happens when I'm trying not to screw up my chances of getting lucky, sad as that is to say. *shame*

Reply

astrogeek01 September 6 2006, 14:41:34 UTC
Actually, that's very interesting. Because having an uninteresting conversation partner greatly reduces their chances of getting lucky, IMO. But if I were on a date, I probably also wouldn't continue talking to fill the void either... so if they weren't contributing to the conversation it would grow awkward pretty quickly.

Huh.

Reply

differenceblog September 6 2006, 14:42:47 UTC
In situations where this has happened, I don't know if the women involved have ever noticed that I wasn't talking. There were no conversational voids (long enough for me to notice).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up