Open Letter to the New York Times

Apr 11, 2007 09:35

To the Health editors of the New York Times:

I was extremely disappointed with Nicholas Wade's article "Pas de Deux of Sexuality Is Written in the Genes" (4/10/2007). While Mr. Wade was correct to reference Larry Cahill's excellent 2006 review, it seems as if Mr. Wade read only the abstract. Dr. Cahill is fairly clear in his review that while ( Read more... )

genes, letters, lynn conway, new york times, gerulf rieger, genetics, chicago tribune, neuroscience, nicholas wade, j michael bailey, sexuality, larry cahill, benedict carey

Leave a comment

Comments 25

thank you eight_not_ate May 13 2007, 19:48:11 UTC
i stumbled upon your blog through an unrelated google search. it's a relief to know that someone else found wade's article biased, offensive, and not very helpful.

Reply


ukelele August 21 2007, 14:03:12 UTC
The controversy in re Bailey apologia-style in today's New York Times science section: right here!

Reply

differenceblog August 21 2007, 14:16:40 UTC
Yeah, I just finished posting about that ... I am furious beyond reason.

I'm not sure I'm catching the apologia reference. It certainly seems from my read of the article that we're supposed to get that Bailey is the victim here.

Reply

ukelele August 21 2007, 16:38:07 UTC
Yes, an "apologia" is a work of praise. It kind of means the opposite of "apology" although you can see how they might have been connected once.

Reply

differenceblog August 21 2007, 16:42:41 UTC
And now I know a new word. Neat!

still a seething fun-sized ball of rage, though.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up