Open Letter to the New York Times

Apr 11, 2007 09:35

To the Health editors of the New York Times:

I was extremely disappointed with Nicholas Wade's article "Pas de Deux of Sexuality Is Written in the Genes" (4/10/2007). While Mr. Wade was correct to reference Larry Cahill's excellent 2006 review, it seems as if Mr. Wade read only the abstract. Dr. Cahill is fairly clear in his review that while ( Read more... )

genes, letters, lynn conway, new york times, gerulf rieger, genetics, chicago tribune, neuroscience, nicholas wade, j michael bailey, sexuality, larry cahill, benedict carey

Leave a comment

Comments 25

njyoder April 12 2007, 01:40:48 UTC
Where does Cahill's review say that it is not necessarily reflected in behavior? In the beginning he mentions brain chemistry differences. If you have a copy of the study, I'd be interested in reading it ( ... )

Reply

lz1982 April 12 2007, 19:34:52 UTC
I *think* his thesis is that bisexuality as an orientation does not exist. Women have bisexual responses to photos, but since, according to him, women are not hard-wired for any sexual orientation, that doesn't mean they are bisexual.

Reply

njyoder April 13 2007, 05:16:58 UTC
So he's suggesting that they start off attracted to neither and then inch toward attraction to just one sex?

Reply

lz1982 April 13 2007, 15:45:35 UTC
Or that they could eventually become bisexual, but it would not be an innate orientation. It would be due to events in their lives. (I think. I'm not too well-versed in this stuff).

Reply


qu_is April 13 2007, 09:12:34 UTC
great letter. - and thanks for the quote above. I wish I had more time to look into it. But the discussion here has been interesting.

Reply


missmimesis April 13 2007, 20:21:03 UTC
great letter; I hope they print it! And I'm thrilled to see this blog...I've long dreamed of creating a blog devoted to pointing out the flaws of all these goddamn studies on gender difference...but as a psychologist you're way better equipped to do so than I am as a literature person. I'm adding you to my friends list.

-Abigail
(repetitioncompulsion.blogspot.com)

Reply

differenceblog April 13 2007, 20:24:27 UTC
Thanks!

Reply


msmsgirl April 14 2007, 01:43:14 UTC
Hey, I'm friending you; I love this blog! Thanks for the comment -- your letter is way, way, way better than mine was, though. You start with a compliment, criticize the way they interpreted a not-evil researcher, and you're so unbelieveably measured and smart in your tone about Bailey. I hope they print it. looking forward to more linkings and take-downs --Christine.

Reply

differenceblog April 14 2007, 01:53:13 UTC
Thank you!

Reply


aesmael April 14 2007, 03:14:18 UTC
That letter is executed so calmly, you have won for yourself another reader.

Reply

differenceblog April 14 2007, 03:25:20 UTC
aww, shucks *grins*

I was really sure I came off as some wall-chewing maniac in this (or maybe sounded like I was Bailey's ex or something equally sordid). I really appreciate the words of support here.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up