Comments | differenceblog: Measuring desire

differenceblog

Measuring desire

Mar 15, 2007 08:54

( Read more... )

clive davis, sexual desire, sadi, sexual arousal and desire inventory, sexual interest, john baldwin, sex, lust, sexual intent, gender differences, ilana spector, data and tools, janice baldwin, rachel toledano, sex differences, james pfaus, fsfi, psychology, libido, female sexual function index, gender stereotypes, sexuality, sociology

Comments 8

(The comment has been removed)

differenceblog March 15 2007, 14:49:01 UTC

No, I generally try to avoid it. But a commenter suggested I tackle this topic again in reference to that column yesterday. I meant to work the link into today's commentary, but I got caught up in looking for a single decent measure of sexual desire.

Seriously, I could spend a week on just this topic. Ye gods.

contrary_wise March 15 2007, 17:01:47 UTC

This week's Savage Love was some crazy talking. No surprises there, really, given his usual level of chick hate. But let's just add another nail to the coffin of women's sexual desire, shall we? And in the meantime, I'll go try to find some interesting queers who can put up with this girl's high libido.

differenceblog March 15 2007, 17:04:46 UTC

I didn't get through the whole column, so I don't want to comment on it.

like that's ever stopped me before. *shame!*

mycrust March 15 2007, 15:55:45 UTC

I love when people draw figures that they just make up.

I mean, I actually do love that when people do it on a napkin or something. I love it in a sarcastic way when it's in a publication.

differenceblog March 15 2007, 15:59:53 UTC

Yeah, note the lack of keys. *eyebrow*

differenceblog March 15 2007, 17:42:39 UTC

more comments at psychology

astrogeek01 March 15 2007, 20:11:30 UTC

*laugh* "if only" I got as much sex as *I* wanted... but hey, being in a relationship is all about balance, and sex isn't the most important thing (even if I did focus on it for a while: what's wrong with me that he doesn't want to have sex?) I think there's waaay too much cultural crap associated with sex, to even remotely unconfound any study.

differenceblog March 15 2007, 20:17:03 UTC

See, this is why I want laboratory-raised experimental subjects! Oh, crap. that's probably not ethical, huh?

*note to everyone who is not astrogeek01: Honestly I am really kidding.*