A slight disagreement.eqfeFebruary 9 2011, 19:41:05 UTC
The shot is sexy because the model is. The short black dress reveals wonderful legs, and a shapely figure. The fact that the dress is made of rubber neither adds not detracts from the gorgeous model. I can't speak for you, but yes I get a sense of dominance here, from the perspective that the first thought I had looking at that photo, was that I hoped that there was a bath mat to kneel on if she decided to sit on the edge of that sink. I'm a huge fan of the basic black dress, and haven't ever seen a beautiful woman who hasn't looked great in one. OTOH there is an old, very true saying. Beauty may be skin deep, but ugly goes clear to the bone. And ugly is not helped by latex. IMHO of course.
Re: A slight disagreement.devifemmeFebruary 9 2011, 20:49:58 UTC
As I look at the shot again, I conclude that she -- like the Dianne you spurned so cavalierly -- is wearing no panties. Which only makes the dress MORE intriguing. It also suggests that Jenna and Dianne are competing with each other.
It also adds to my admiration for Jon -- who must survive incredible distractions in order to produce any photos at all!
Re: A slight disagreement.eqfeFebruary 9 2011, 21:52:49 UTC
Justine, I love you but you made me giigle. If Dianne and Jenna are competing, It reminds me of the "famous" competition that the Beach Boys thought they had with the Beatles. Often in interviews the Beach Boys would discuss this competition. OTOH the Beatles were completely unaware of the competition.
Re: A slight disagreement.devifemmeFebruary 9 2011, 22:30:16 UTC
Interesting parallel, but only so far.
Actually, I'd retract the "competing" bit: if, in fact, they are top and bottom (and that would be soooo cool!), there's a whole different dynamic going on -- and the rock groups have nothing to do with it.
I think this is a much sexier picture than the first one. Black suits her better, her legs are superb and the pose is more effective, too. But... somehow it still doesn't work for me. Still not on the good side of cool and elegant. To me it lacks certain fluidum. Something that would make all these poses much more believeable. I'd give 40, maybe.
Ooh, too low -- I don't put up any shot that I'd mark so low! Funny how you and "eqfe" like the opposite sorts of girls. But, of course, that's it: a guy picks up certain vibes from a girl, even in a photo; a girl (who is attracted to girls, especially) picks up different ones.
Re: oppositespony_rocksFebruary 9 2011, 22:35:19 UTC
Hmmm, you don't? To be honest, I'd be delighted to see a greater variety of your choice girls - only to examine your tastes. :)
You are very right on the vibes. Fact is I often fail to see the supposed erotic appeal in a woman that's really popular with men.
BTW, completely different girl, but... what do you think of Nigella Lawson? Among celebrities, I find her to be the most erotic woman by far, despite the fact that she is not my type at all! (I prefer pale, slender red-heads - possibly with freckles - or madonna types with maudlin eyes.)
Now you've raised the complexity factor. Looking at photos, I find that pure physical attractiveness is the only real appeal. Sure an outfit, lighting, props (e.g. riding crop) can add to the appeal or give the imagination room to roam. With someone like Nigella, whom I've seen on talk shows, her own shows etc., personality really becomes a factor. She comes off to me as bright, well read, confident, etc., and someone I would love to cook with, literally and figuratively. Edit: and I was just watching her as I wrote that comment.
Comments 12
I can't speak for you, but yes I get a sense of dominance here, from the perspective that the first thought I had looking at that photo, was that I hoped that there was a bath mat to kneel on if she decided to sit on the edge of that sink.
I'm a huge fan of the basic black dress, and haven't ever seen a beautiful woman who hasn't looked great in one. OTOH there is an old, very true saying. Beauty may be skin deep, but ugly goes clear to the bone. And ugly is not helped by latex. IMHO of course.
Reply
It also adds to my admiration for Jon -- who must survive incredible distractions in order to produce any photos at all!
Hugz,
J
Reply
Reply
Actually, I'd retract the "competing" bit: if, in fact, they are top and bottom (and that would be soooo cool!), there's a whole different dynamic going on -- and the rock groups have nothing to do with it.
Hugz
J
Reply
I think this is a much sexier picture than the first one. Black suits her better, her legs are superb and the pose is more effective, too.
But... somehow it still doesn't work for me. Still not on the good side of cool and elegant. To me it lacks certain fluidum. Something that would make all these poses much more believeable. I'd give 40, maybe.
Reply
Hugz, J
Reply
You are very right on the vibes. Fact is I often fail to see the supposed erotic appeal in a woman that's really popular with men.
BTW, completely different girl, but... what do you think of Nigella Lawson? Among celebrities, I find her to be the most erotic woman by far, despite the fact that she is not my type at all! (I prefer pale, slender red-heads - possibly with freckles - or madonna types with maudlin eyes.)
Reply
With someone like Nigella, whom I've seen on talk shows, her own shows etc., personality really becomes a factor. She comes off to me as bright, well read, confident, etc., and someone I would love to cook with, literally and figuratively.
Edit: and I was just watching her as I wrote that comment.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment