Livejournal
Log in
Post
Friends
My journal
darkenedeyes
(Untitled)
Jun 03, 2004 18:14
The naughtiest number is: 15?
Leave a comment
Comments 27
jackdragon
June 3 2004, 23:13:52 UTC
Why is that?
Reply
darkenedeyes
June 8 2004, 04:20:27 UTC
Well, can you think of a naughtier one? "Sixty-nine" is the obvious answer, or "seventy," but those are more sexy, and less naughty.
Reply
jackdragon
June 8 2004, 22:08:31 UTC
Oh okay. I like 66... pretty legs they call it.
Reply
darkenedeyes
June 9 2004, 15:41:33 UTC
Pretty legs? I hadn't heard that before. . . 88 is rather sexy as well. All those doubles--must be the fascination with twins. : )
Reply
eeatme
June 3 2004, 23:51:54 UTC
Ohhh yeah, Baby! I'm wet just thinking about it!!!
Reply
darkenedeyes
June 4 2004, 01:25:46 UTC
How delicious! ; )
Reply
eeatme
June 4 2004, 01:27:11 UTC
lol, seriously... what does that mean?
Reply
darkenedeyes
June 8 2004, 04:21:52 UTC
Ah, now that would be telling, wouldn't it? ; )
Reply
Thread 19
vulgarobsession
June 6 2004, 14:01:17 UTC
is it because its not easily divisable? ok ok i have no idea!
Reply
darkenedeyes
June 8 2004, 04:21:00 UTC
Ah, division always arouses me so. . . ; )
Reply
danae
June 11 2004, 19:16:04 UTC
EVERYTHING arouses you
Reply
darkenedeyes
June 11 2004, 21:53:54 UTC
No, not true! Knitting, for example--not arousing at all.
Although. . . all that soft yarn. . . all those colors. . . ; )
Reply
Leave a comment
Up
Comments 27
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Although. . . all that soft yarn. . . all those colors. . . ; )
Reply
Leave a comment