Not much going on today, except that I think I'm coming down with my mother's snerfy cold, so am resting up with Allegra-D today in hopes of not being too wiped out tomorrow to blog the Oscars.
(Something interesting I noticed: there's a commercial that's been airing for Amazing Grace, a movie I had not even heard of, but yet involves a number of
(
Read more... )
Comments 77
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Here's some linkspam for you: a bunch of librarians, teacher, parents, etc, are doing the megaflip over this year's Newbery Award choice. Apparently, the book mentions male genitalia. These people are pretty deep in denial- don't they realize that most kids know all this stuff as soon as they go into school? Yeesh.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/books/18newb.html?_r=1&em&ex=1171947600&en=1b95b92b41074cc1&ei=5087&oref=slogin
Reply
And at least one of the quoted librarians has come forward to say that her mildly cautious reply to the reporter's questions were completely twisted for publication. Nearly all of the librarians quoted, foolish or in denial though they may be, are elementary school librarians, and when parents get their knickers in a twist over book selection, they're likely to get fired.
Sorry to unload but I hate how widely this tiny pebble in the water is rippling, and how ignorantly many of the articles I've seen are dogpiling on librarians in general over the over-reaction of the few.
Reply
International Herald Tribune These people actually solicited and properly attributed quotes from a variety of sources. The mainstay of the NYT article is one librarian and the famous "dozens of people support me in email" gambit.
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Reply
Also, librarians are inherently awesome, and fought (and fight) to protect our rights from the PATRIOT Act, so you know, the NYT ought not to be hatin' on them.
Reply
Leave a comment