I always think these posts will be "last one for a while", but there's just more coming up all the time. :-}
This
whole Tiger Woods thing is causing a fair bit of
commentary from the non-monogamy faction (much as the whole Bill Clinton thing did 12 years ago). But in particular, I couldn't not repost the one from my fandom object
Jay Michaelson,
(
Read more... )
Comments 32
That's cyan_blue's paper.
Reply
Ah, but I see she links to her professional webpage from her LJ, so OK.
(I haven't met her, but I know she visited Boston recently!)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
*huge hug*
I have been there. It maybe wasn't really totally about non-monogamy for me (though that turned out to be part of it!) I was at that point at the end of my relationship with Ben. There was also a point where I regularly fantasized about his untimely death as well, so that I wouldn't have to deal with our situation anymore and I couldn't be at fault for ending it.
Er. Anyway. What I mean, is, you're not alone in feeling the ways you have felt. Thank you for sharing, and letting us be here to witness your honesty.
Reply
Well, it certainly wasn't TOTALLY about non-monogamy for me either. But that was the Deal-Breaker. The part that made *him* say "oh, no, everything else you might be to me doesn't matter, nothing I can do here."
Reply
Most couples (which includes Jethrien and I) tend to exclude romance/sexuality from the things that you can get elsewhere. But as Dan Savage constantly notes, there's no reason that has to be so.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment