Chaos cannot be held culpable for a deed that is part of his very nature and while the plaintiff may seem innocent of any blame, how can we be sure? I rule that the one at fault is the bouncey ball, utilising a cunning plan to force misplaced suspicion.
Yes indeed, the bouncy ball should have been further questioned on this matter, since it has once again escaped custody, possibly to continue its nefarious plotting. :-P
Comments 31
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment