Statistics and polls, part Three

Aug 20, 2006 23:21

Next step in the great statistical project. *g*

results of the first poll )

ckr stats, ckr, poll

Leave a comment

Comments 49

izzybeth August 20 2006, 21:42:40 UTC
my god, i'm so deprived. i haven't seen hardly any of this stuff. (or maybe i've only seen the ones that are actually good? hm.)

Reply

c_regalis August 20 2006, 21:50:34 UTC
Well, that explains why you were much faster done with the poll than me. *shakes cramped hand* I might have overdone it a bit. Ahem.

or maybe i've only seen the ones that are actually good?
*checks your answers* Smallville? *giggles*

Reply

izzybeth August 20 2006, 21:53:39 UTC
i think you were very thorough. i mean, it's stats. you have at least try to be accurate. :D

well, i've seen screencaps of SV, so i can tell if he's hot and crazy (but i can't tell if he's queer).

Reply

c_regalis August 20 2006, 22:02:44 UTC
Yesyes, accuracy, that's what it is all about. *nodsnods*

And hee, yes. For hot and crazy are screencaps enough, I can see that. Queerness is more complicated than that.

Reply


streetspirit18 August 20 2006, 22:40:36 UTC
OMGOMGOMG!!! *flails*

What, there's no Rollie? *cries*

And no Palmberg? *cries more*

And YAY Poll! ♥♥♥

*twirls you*

Reply

c_regalis August 20 2006, 23:18:18 UTC
Yeah, no Rollie. *sniff* No Palmberg, no Inspector Wood, no Jerry, no Christy. They just didn't make it.

*pets them all*

*jerks hand back when Palmberg licks it* Ew.

But yay, POLL. There will be one more entry with the results (and some other stuff) and then I'll be done. (Which is... well, I'll be glad, you know? It's kind of, uh, a lot of work. *is lazy*)

*beams*

Reply

_unhurt_ August 20 2006, 23:25:54 UTC
*jerks hand back when Palmberg licks it* Ew.

see, i'm liking palmberg based on just this.

Reply

c_regalis August 20 2006, 23:33:22 UTC
Because he licked my hand or because there is actually a character played by CKR that I wouldn't want to lick me? (He didn't made it into the poll, sadly. He would have been quite interesting though.)

Reply


_unhurt_ August 20 2006, 23:24:36 UTC
so, i have to have SEEN something to vote on it, right? i mean, i can't just look at the screencaps and then guess?

Reply

c_regalis August 20 2006, 23:29:50 UTC
Um. If you think the caps are enough, go ahead. It's mostly okay for the hotness question at least. And mostly even for the craziness question. The queerness isn't so easy just from screencaps though. But, well, you can click whatever you want, you know? *g*

Reply

_unhurt_ August 20 2006, 23:52:00 UTC
*cicks like craaazzy*

ok, actually, i'm so tired i keep locking the scroll button and then my clicking goes wrong, so i'm going to do my poll responding at tea-break tomorrow. sorry!

Reply

c_regalis August 21 2006, 00:16:15 UTC
Yeah, I know what you mean. It's kind of an "answer at work" poll anyway. *g*

Reply


china_shop August 21 2006, 07:36:58 UTC
Those ticky-boxes make me happy beyond measure! \o/

Reply

c_regalis August 21 2006, 15:10:34 UTC
*g* They make me happy as well. \c/

Reply


_unhurt_ August 21 2006, 14:22:29 UTC
phew! much more fun than invoicing. for the record, with the (oh god, HUGE NUMBER) of things i have not seen i forebore to vote on queerness or craziness, but i did carefully examine the pictures and vote on hotness.

most disappointed that there's no "justifiably homicidal" category (hi, leoben). ;)

Reply

c_regalis August 21 2006, 15:16:53 UTC
but i did carefully examine the pictures and vote on hotness.

That's good, that's very good. Accuracy, that's what it is all about, after all. *approves*

most disappointed that there's no "justifiably homicidal" category (hi, leoben). ;)

Well, I just couldn't include every single flavor of crazy that CKR has to offer here. I mean, see how long the poll is anyway? (But "justifiably homicidal", I like that. Like, A LOT.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up