I haven't finished reading this yet, but I already know it's going to be the kind of book where I just want to read out random passages to strangers, so here is a bit I liked
( Read more... )
In that case I have an anecdote I've probably not told you: when I was at university, I had a tutor who was popularly reputed to be a recruiter for British Intelligence. He never mentioned anything to me directly, but after I got my degree, I got a letter inviting me to a secret interview in London at the Ministry of Defence. It said something like 'in your own interest don't disclose this to anyone'. It was THE MOST LE CARRE THING!!!
Obviously, demonstrating just how utterly wrong he'd got me, I instantly told everyone I knew about it, and have been doing so periodically ever since. :-DDD
As a lawyer, I have to rather disagree with him about how I see facts. Facts are the scaffolding, the supports on which I build the compelling structure of my arguments. In a certain kind of case, facts are a great bell to be struck with a well-tuned argument so that the truth rings out and cannot be ignored.
But I am a rather liberal, activist sort of lawyer. There are those of us are rather agnostic about whether one can actually get at 'truth', so I suppose he's talking about them. Some are even agnostic about whether there is such a thing as trut.
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Obviously, demonstrating just how utterly wrong he'd got me, I instantly told everyone I knew about it, and have been doing so periodically ever since. :-DDD
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
But I am a rather liberal, activist sort of lawyer. There are those of us are rather agnostic about whether one can actually get at 'truth', so I suppose he's talking about them. Some are even agnostic about whether there is such a thing as trut.
Reply
Leave a comment