we've painted a picture, now we're drowning in the paint

Dec 28, 2002 19:18

forgive my divagation. this post may not be outlining the original thesis ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 42

ller December 28 2002, 20:01:55 UTC
brilliant.

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 14:46:31 UTC
the name works for you, although i don't think you're in much of a disguise.

thanks. i hope the stranger didn't touch you.

Reply

ller December 29 2002, 19:19:49 UTC
what a compliment. thank you.

Reply


majandra December 28 2002, 20:02:43 UTC
hahahaha only chicks comment on your entries. yes i realize dan did too.

so that was real nice. made me think about a few things, as always. keep keeping it real brother.

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 14:47:50 UTC
now, there will be no rough-housing in my journal. go do it in jason's, he doesn't care.

what things? you mean, getting high?

real? it doesn't get much more real than this icon, sister.

Reply

majandra December 29 2002, 15:27:07 UTC
*smooth houses* hahaha i'm so clever.

yes, precisely. you make me think about baking up.

i don't suppose it does.

ahahha i still can't believe you wrote an entry about paint chips. i'm in love

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 15:38:16 UTC
majandra delfino-boyd: the master manipulator of words.

i said i'd do it, so i did.

Reply


mike_einziger December 29 2002, 00:56:19 UTC
spectacular. fabulous. wonderful. amazing.

i would just like to let you know what i and three other girls were thinking.

what if there was to be someone who had no emotions and felt no love but wanted to paint? would the canvas be blank and as white as it had come? or would it be as dark as the heaven glows down upon us as the crescent radiates the sky?

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 14:53:32 UTC
you forgot fantastic, marvelous, and brilliant, but mel already covered the bases. kidding.

which three other girls? i'd like to thank them.

i believe the canvas would be neither. if the artist felt nothing, he would have nothing in which to paint. no muse, no paint, no picture. the canvas would be streaked with red for in place of the paint, he would have to use his own crimson blood.

Reply

mike_einziger December 29 2002, 15:17:32 UTC
right answer.

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 15:38:48 UTC
thanks.

Reply


ben_einziger December 29 2002, 08:18:45 UTC
you are one of the only people i know who could pull off a post about paint like that.

don't expect compliments like that again.

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 14:55:26 UTC
thanks, ben.

i won't. with a brother such as yours, i know far too well.

Reply

ben_einziger December 29 2002, 14:57:13 UTC
no problem, brandon.

i am much cooler than my brother. you should have learned this by now as well.

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 14:59:16 UTC
that's true. everyone's much cooler than your brother. perhaps except jason.

Reply


kate_bosworth December 29 2002, 15:00:43 UTC
Well, I would say that was beyond words but I believe you already covered them.

A painter may put his heart and soul out into a painting so that the outcome would display what he was feeling inside and what he saw in the world. Would it be wrong for him to discard it also? To place the painting as a friend as to tell its secrets to and then relieve themselves of the pain or happiness.

Reply

brandon_boyd December 29 2002, 15:14:19 UTC
thank you.

feelings may come and go. it would only be a crime done to himself if he chose to discard the painting. the work would have been done in vain. it's always nice to have a reminder of what you used to be and who you are now around.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up