Comments | bigbrother_lj: WEEK 3: Villain Eviction Ceremony

light_on in bigbrother_lj

WEEK 3: Villain Eviction Ceremony

Aug 12, 2011 16:36

( Read more... )

eviction ceremony, bblj15, week 3, eviction

Comments 15

HoH Question for Victoria light_on August 12 2011, 23:38:23 UTC

Victoria, how do you feel your reign as HoH went this week? Your nominations were the first of the season to be veto'd. How did that make you feel? Are you happy with the replacement or is just formality?

Re: HoH Question for Victoria awkwardskribble August 14 2011, 18:06:39 UTC

It was stressful, to be honest. But I guess it was alright. I was kind of expecting it to be vetoed when Austin won PoV. So really, replacing Robert was just a formality. I spoke with Casey about it before putting him up and I think he understood my reasoning for it.

Plea from Casey light_on August 12 2011, 23:39:12 UTC

Casey, this is your last chance to convince those voting in your house to keep you in the game. Why should they vote to keep you in the house over Paloma?

Plea from Paloma light_on August 12 2011, 23:39:52 UTC

Paloma, this is your last chance to convince those voting in your house to keep you in the game. Why should they vote to keep you in the house over Casey?

Re: Plea from Paloma paloma_n_regina August 13 2011, 11:12:17 UTC

Cuz I'm super awesome and don't bother anyone with bullshit.

PoV Question for Austin light_on August 12 2011, 23:41:36 UTC

Austin, are you at all surprised that every single PoV winner thus far has been from the Villain House or is it just a matter of circumstance? How badly did you need to win it this week?

Question for the House light_on August 12 2011, 23:48:30 UTC

Looking at the Hero House, the HoHs have nominated and evicted players that were either labeled to be inactive, or they just simply didn't do anything. In the Villain House, inactivity is apparently rewarded. Going into this vote, what do you plan on accomplishing with it?

Re: Question for the House harlem_nocturne August 13 2011, 00:58:57 UTC

I plan on accomplishing the common goal that was stated by the "entire house" to eliminate inactive players. Although 2 inactive players sit amongst us, only one was nominated, which leads me and the viewer to believe that some foolishness is afoot. I hope this isn't the case, as a common goal was stated.

...I hope.

Re: Question for the House ohkabash August 13 2011, 01:57:10 UTC

Inactivity is not rewarded.

Emma vs. Paloma: Emma is evicted because she was seriously more disturbed than Paloma.

Stacey vs. Paloma: Let's just be honest - I wanted Stacey out of the game and I got her out of the game. Kbye.

Casey vs. Paloma: Bye Paloma.

Week one both Paloma and Emma were "even" in terms of inactivity. Week two, I had a specific target; it was not Paloma. Week three and Paloma will be voted out.

Re: Question for the House marine_geek August 14 2011, 03:56:46 UTC

The hero house has a good plan and is making efforts to become stronger before the merge but I disagree about our side of the house. We aren't rewarding floaters, first week was emma and this week should be Paloma. Thats 2 out of 3 for floaters and from what I understand the house evicted Stacey because she is unpredictable, something we don't need going into the merge ourselves. So we are doing exactly what the heroes are doing, making ourselves stronger for when we join up.
When we do merge I want you to know that the heroes are going down because the Villains are more serious about playing and don't care about being nice or not. After this vote our side of the house will be full of active strong players who may have some differences but those can be put aside until we rid the house of the heroes once the merge happens.

Thread 5