WEEK 3: Villain Eviction Ceremony

[light_on]

Comments

Question for the House

[light_on]

Looking at the Hero House, the HoHs have nominated and evicted players that were either labeled to be inactive, or they just simply didn't do anything. In the Villain House, inactivity is apparently rewarded. Going into this vote, what do you plan on accomplishing with it?

Re: Question for the House

[harlem_nocturne]

I plan on accomplishing the common goal that was stated by the "entire house" to eliminate inactive players. Although 2 inactive players sit amongst us, only one was nominated, which leads me and the viewer to believe that some foolishness is afoot. I hope this isn't the case, as a common goal was stated.

...I hope.

Re: Question for the House

[ohkabash]

Inactivity is not rewarded.

Emma vs. Paloma: Emma is evicted because she was seriously more disturbed than Paloma.

Stacey vs. Paloma: Let's just be honest - I wanted Stacey out of the game and I got her out of the game. Kbye.

Casey vs. Paloma: Bye Paloma.

Week one both Paloma and Emma were "even" in terms of inactivity. Week two, I had a specific target; it was not Paloma. Week three and Paloma will be voted out.

Re: Question for the House

[marine_geek]

The hero house has a good plan and is making efforts to become stronger before the merge but I disagree about our side of the house. We aren't rewarding floaters, first week was emma and this week should be Paloma. Thats 2 out of 3 for floaters and from what I understand the house evicted Stacey because she is unpredictable, something we don't need going into the merge ourselves. So we are doing exactly what the heroes are doing, making ourselves stronger for when we join up.
When we do merge I want you to know that the heroes are going down because the Villains are more serious about playing and don't care about being nice or not. After this vote our side of the house will be full of active strong players who may have some differences but those can be put aside until we rid the house of the heroes once the merge happens.

Re: Question for the House

[awkwardskribble]

I guess you could say we had a specific target this week, like Ashley did with Stacey. For me, Robert was merely a space holder for the second nomination, and so is Casey. They were only nominated because, well, there had to be two and that's just what it came down to. I guess I'm planning on getting it down to the people who actually want to play this game. After this week is when shit starts to get real. "Easy" votes are going to be out.