conflict is a kind of intimacy: be it bratty, unresolved, or constructive, it's not enough by itself

Aug 07, 2014 01:32

All conflict is intimacy. It is a genuine, exposing kind of interaction. This is why people say that hate and love are two sides of the same coin, and the trope of falling in love with the antagonist exists. This is why if you're constantly in disagreements with someone (like a coworker or classmate), you may feel closer to them than to strangers, ( Read more... )

lovetech, kylei, conflict, intimacy, topaz, relationships

Leave a comment

Comments 18

ellettra August 7 2014, 16:59:32 UTC
Very interesting and insightful post!

Reply

belenen August 12 2014, 04:59:18 UTC
thanks!

Reply


meri_sielu August 7 2014, 21:35:17 UTC
So insightful, I never thought of conflict as being a kind of intimacy but you're right! I can see how interconnected they are. Lots to think about here, Thankyou. :)

Reply

belenen August 12 2014, 04:59:35 UTC
you're most welcome!

Reply


ohhhlife August 9 2014, 23:24:18 UTC
This is so interesting! I have a history of being with people who fight with me or pick on me, but i NEVER respond in kind. I also don't know if i've ever -really- felt close to anyone. Interesting to think about it from this perspective!

Reply

belenen August 12 2014, 05:00:01 UTC
glad it gave you some food for thought!

Reply


kehlen August 10 2014, 14:37:47 UTC
This is so spot on, but for some reason I have never heard about conflicts from this viewpoint. Thank you for pointing it out.

Reply

belenen August 12 2014, 05:00:20 UTC
you're most welcome :)

Reply


I used this raidingparty August 13 2014, 14:40:41 UTC
Showed to my partner. We argue playfully almost every day, but we still need some work on managing stuff when we're actually in conflict.

In related news, the same Japanese phrase, translated "the one you face", works for both "dance partner" and "opponent".

Reply


Leave a comment

Up