Question Regarding Finale

Mar 01, 2010 19:08

After watching the finale, I had a question in regards to something that happened.

SPOILERS for series 2 finale )

spoilers, discussion, 2x08

Leave a comment

Comments 16

curls March 2 2010, 00:27:38 UTC
I think we're supposed to believe vampires can die, but perhaps staking through the heart (which is the traditional vampire killing method) is the only way to ensure that they can't be resurrected.

We also have to take into account how many of the vampires would know that the healing power of blood can bring vampires back from the dead. I mean, I don't think it would be common knowledge, otherwise, all the vamps could come back.

And how much blood is needed? It took two of them to raise Herrick and Daisy seemed very weak from the process. It doesn't appear to be the easiest process.

Reply


libertine_lust March 2 2010, 00:30:40 UTC
I don't know and If their was a way to do it then why would they (particularly Daisy) bring back Herrick and not Ivan? How did Cara even survive? It was quite bizarre by the end, I'm not sure honestly what to make of this series when it's been good it's been beyond great but some bits just haven't fitted quite right for me.

Annie's Leaving made me weep and want to rip Kemps head off and the bit with the TV was excellent as was the slow build up of Mitchell in the Facility.

Reply

luminousmotion March 2 2010, 02:03:59 UTC
Cara was in a dungeon at the time of the explosion.

Reply

deadlyfurniture March 2 2010, 16:54:41 UTC
Mitchell(I think it was)took Cara a boy to feed on so she got strong again.

Reply

yilesse March 2 2010, 19:33:49 UTC
Cara said Daisy brought her a kid when she found her :)

Reply


miserychick2602 March 2 2010, 00:42:09 UTC
After last night, I'm actually wondering if it's an age based thing. Lauren was pretty 'young' when she went up in smoke, but Ivan who was pretty old, didn't. And it would appear that Herrick (don't recall how old he is) left bones. *shrug*

Reply


luminousmotion March 2 2010, 02:04:31 UTC
From what was said at the end they didn't burn herrick. They just buried his remains.

Reply


vivalakodiee March 2 2010, 17:05:01 UTC
I think that it is simply because Herrick wasn't staked through the heart. His remains were buried after George's attack from what has been said, though who buried them I'm not sure. I can't see it being Mitchell, as when he said in series 3 to Daisy that there was someone else I'm presuming he meant Cara.

Still, who knows what the producers & Toby will come up with next.

Reply

yilesse March 2 2010, 19:42:14 UTC
Daisy said that Mitchell had told her where the bones were, I don't know who was supposed to have buried him but it wasn't Cara. Maybe Mitchell did do it out of a lingering sense of friendship?

Reply

vivalakodiee March 2 2010, 19:43:56 UTC
I never noticed Daisy saying that, but that makes more sense. Mitchell could have did it from the sense of friendship, I like that idea. Or maybe he thought that wherever he buried him, no one would find them?

Reply

yilesse March 2 2010, 19:47:31 UTC
I've watched the episode three (I think could even be four) times so I picked up on a lot of the details :P

Doing it so that nobody finding the remains is a good idea and maybe he let it slip to Daisy while they were on their killing spree? I don't see him just telling her for no reason while he was 'normal' Mitchell.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up