Yeah, sorry about that. Honestly, I was kind of on the fence about posting it at all for precisely this reason, but the sheer WTFery meant I kind of needed to vent.
Yeah, I can see a Jack the Ripper style serial killer type thing being interesting if properly handled, but this seemed like someone deliberately tying controversy to a mallet and repeatedly beating the world round the head with it. Suffice to say I'm going to be avoiding them from now on, outside of LARP as well.
Now do you see what my brain must suffer!? I swear, I'm tempted to pass this on to the college councillor, as he really doesn't seem to see anything wrong with it...
if he wanted to get his sadistic cannibal sociopath on in safe, make believe time that's fine. But adding in the children as the victim is just in bad taste and going too far. How does destroying children benefit the overall plot lines? it doesn't. Grow the fuck up and change your compulsive target to 6', 200lb weight lifter males. That'll make things interesting.
Yeah, the killing isn't a problem. The cannibalism could work, too, and we've got a couple of ragingly sadistic characters running around already. It's the rape and especially paedophilia that's a huge steaming pile of WTF. Although I must say that last idea could most entertaining for a serial killer character. After this guy, though, I think characters with that basis are off the menu for a long, long time to come.
done well, with a reason, a i don't have issue with a serial rapist. It's the kids that are unnessesary. Oh well, i don't larp at all but i'd deal with his character in game. how? kill his character. why? his face pissed you off. Oh, now he has to make a new character.
And whoops, sorry, game policy is clearly posted--no retreads.
I've actually done this in MUDs before to people who insisted on making PCs clearly doomed to failure. Hey, I'm nice about it at least. I give them a warning of "Hey, you do realize that the base town is like 500 people and it won't be that awfully hard to figure out who's (insert ghastly thing here), right?"
Re-doing something because it didn't work right the first time, sometimes allowed if something was missed or somebody god modded or something went wrong.
...Holy fuck. What the hell made them think that this was okay to base a character on!? And in LARP at that! If it was online it would be all kinds of WTF, but extra fail for this being LARP. 8/
I don't even want to know how they would go about playing it out.
Comments 264
Excuse me while I go barf...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've actually done this in MUDs before to people who insisted on making PCs clearly doomed to failure. Hey, I'm nice about it at least. I give them a warning of "Hey, you do realize that the base town is like 500 people and it won't be that awfully hard to figure out who's (insert ghastly thing here), right?"
Reply
What's that?
Reply
Re-doing something because it didn't work right the first time, sometimes allowed if something was missed or somebody god modded or something went wrong.
At least thats how I read it.
Reply
Reply
I don't even want to know how they would go about playing it out.
Reply
Leave a comment