No, I don't think it's valid, per se. I guess what I meant is something more along the lines of "What if the arts DID improve consistently the same way?" or maybe "Maybe the arts DO improve the same way, and we're just biased." Really what I was thinking about is "Why do so many artists lose their sense of history?"
Comments 5
If technology and science improve over time and past technology and science become obsolete, why isn't this the same for arts?
C'mon. I have trouble believing that you think that this is truly a valid question. I mean, maybe, but...
Reply
Reply
Maybe I'll edit it.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment