E.F. Schumacher (In his book "A Guide for the Perplexed") refers to those types of questions as "divergent questions" while those that have an answer (like what is the best shape for a wheel to be) are "convergent questions" (because the various paths toward the solution converge upon one another.)
After explaining that difference, Schumacher goes on to say that the divergent questions are the most important and are the ones that we should spend most of our energy pondering and striving to answer/solve.
While I appreciate the irony, I think you're alluding to the common practice of conflating love and lust, on the cultural grounds that we're not supposed to admit to being lustful. As if our simian ancestors would've bothered reproducing if they *weren't*...
Ooops. I revised my statement below. There is a higher love but it's not called "in love" in my parlance. Some objects can be the recipient of both types.
I don't think that's necessarily accurate. You can have love without lust. I think the emotional fixation is an important part of love. And I don't think it's "pretending to proclaim someone else's virtues". In my (admittedly rather limited) experience with the love spectrum, it seems more a matter of delusion. You genuinely believe the other person is great and wonderful and perfect, at least at the start.
You genuinely believe the other person is great and wonderful and perfect, at least at the start.
This part's fair enough. I'll have to think about the rest. I don't quite consider that kind of love the same as being in love for some reason more by way of how I define terms.
Comments 32
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
After explaining that difference, Schumacher goes on to say that the divergent questions are the most important and are the ones that we should spend most of our energy pondering and striving to answer/solve.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
best,
Joel
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
This part's fair enough. I'll have to think about the rest. I don't quite consider that kind of love the same as being in love for some reason more by way of how I define terms.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment