Read
yesterday's Penny-Arcade, and thought, okay, I have seen the old guy in another PA, but where?
Not a question the search function was likely to solve, I dropped into the PA forums and went to the abyss that is Social Entropy++ to check whether there had been anything about it in the new comic thread. Which there had,
question solvedBut there
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Now, if Rowling had done this with the intent of filling the gaps later with more books, I wouldn't be so unhappy about that -- even a second series that involved the Harry Potter universe but only had the HP characters as cameos. But Rowling seems pretty adamant that this isn't going to happen, so I think she should have provided more closure.
And I don't agree with the people who say this is better because it lets you imagine what happened -- if I want to imagine what happens then I'll write my own story. I read books because I want to see other people's stories, not make up my own.
Reply
Somebody wrote an interesting post on one of the communities talking about how the epilogue was good because it took the book full-circle and established Harry not only as "the boy who lived [i.e. survived Voldemort's attack]", but "the boy who lived [i.e. was able to live a normal life after everything settled down]" which makes sense.
Reply
I'm also beginning to be annoyed at the scarcity of childless witches - off the top of my head, the only married witch I can think of who does not have children is Bellatrix. >_>
Reply
Admittedly, the list of things I wanted to know in the aftermath could have filled several dozen more chapters, if not a whole other book... but. Eh. I was a little disappointed.
Reply
Leave a comment