Conference presentations vs. journal publications

Dec 10, 2008 17:04

Which do you think would do more to help an application to a PhD program ( Read more... )

publications, conferences

Leave a comment

Comments 27

homericlaughter December 10 2008, 22:41:36 UTC
Obviously, it would be wonderful if you could find some way to do both.

If I *had* to choose, I'd take publication. It lasts longer.

Reply

bananainpyjamas December 10 2008, 22:45:03 UTC
Thanks for the input! My concern is that it would be seen as overkill to wring two presentations and a journal publication out of one study.

Reply

teaganc December 10 2008, 22:54:19 UTC
I know people who have presented a version of a paper that becomes a publication later. Present the less refined version, and then work with the faculty member to refine more until it is publishable. Then, publish.

Reply

signsoflife December 10 2008, 22:58:47 UTC
I'm actually a bit confused. I've never encountered this idea that presenting data at a conference somehow prevents it from being publishable later. How are the people who didn't attend the conference supposed to learn about your work?

Reply


kello24841 December 10 2008, 22:53:21 UTC
So, you already have something under the "Conference" section of your CV? I would go for publication, and start working on that section. Shows your work is good in a variety of contexts.

Reply

bananainpyjamas December 10 2008, 23:06:04 UTC
I have the conference presentation mentioned here and a student conference presentation. So yes, it probably would be good to try for publication. Thanks!

Reply


sporkgoddess December 10 2008, 23:17:17 UTC
bananainpyjamas December 10 2008, 23:37:39 UTC
That was my impression as well, thanks!

Reply


gangur December 11 2008, 04:06:44 UTC
Both is best. Publication is better. The chance of someone seeing your presentation is low.

Reply

bananainpyjamas December 11 2008, 19:23:38 UTC
That's what I figured, thanks!

Reply


rusleeping December 11 2008, 05:36:20 UTC
Not even close. Peer-reviewed journal articles trump publications every time--unless the publication is a fifth-tier online journal no one has heard of and the conference is an ultra-competitive national conference with a very low acceptance rate.

Your earlier concern about getting two conference papers and a publication out of the same data set are unfounded. As long as your are testing new hypotheses, you have nothing to worry about.

Reply

bananainpyjamas December 11 2008, 19:25:30 UTC
Thanks for the input! The conference is pretty competitive but my guess is that publication in a respectable journal would still be more difficult. I'll ask some professors in the field just to make sure.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up