Hi folks
I've found the information here really helpful so far. Wondering if anyone has any generalizations or rules-of thumb on what my application-obsessed mind has been pondering: the relationship between GRE, GPA, and rank of school.
Obviously, admissions decisions are made on more than just the numbers. But that doesn't mean the numbers don't
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
And ranking graduate departments by the rank of university according to undergraduate rankings is not the best way to go.
Reply
Reply
When I applied to my program, they actually showed a slide with the statistics of this year's applicants (GPA and GRE) on it, I guess because they wanted to impress us with the caliber of the applicant pool and the overall goodness of the program. But, my classmate who was made really nervous by that because he had almost the lowest scores still got accepted. I know in science, at least, there are candidates with mediocre GRE/GPA at top programs because those people have awesome research backgrounds and were well on their way to becoming experts in a topic before they applied. Meanwhile, lots of people right out of undergrad with great numbers will be rejected if they show no sign of being prepared for doing research.
If your school has a cutoff for GPA or GRE, you need to meet it. Otherwise, anything goes.
Reply
For programs in my field, 3.5 is pretty OK, and above a 1400 means no one will reject you based on your scores. I also know people who have gotten into great programs with less-than awesome GREs, or sub-3 GPAs. YMMV :)
Reply
If your combined verbal/quantitative is <=1200, then choose a range of programs based on who is there and the research they are doing. Weight your selection to include more "safety" programs.
Admissions decisions are made on a wide range of factors that will vary from department to department. There's no magic formula.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment