Tiers of schools and numbers

Oct 19, 2008 00:14

Hi folks
I've found the information here really helpful so far.  Wondering if anyone has any generalizations or rules-of thumb on what my application-obsessed mind has been pondering:  the relationship between GRE, GPA, and rank of school.

Obviously, admissions decisions are made on more than just the numbers.  But that doesn't mean the numbers don't ( Read more... )

gpa, scores, gre

Leave a comment

Comments 7

shaydlip October 18 2008, 12:09:30 UTC
Generally speaking, GRE and GPA only keep you out, they don't get you in. If your scores are high enough, then they'll take the time to look at your other materials- SOP, LORs, etc.

And ranking graduate departments by the rank of university according to undergraduate rankings is not the best way to go.

Reply

flamingjune07 October 18 2008, 18:50:15 UTC
iawtc.

Reply


ravenword October 18 2008, 14:05:37 UTC
Matching of research interests definitely overshadows the numbers.

When I applied to my program, they actually showed a slide with the statistics of this year's applicants (GPA and GRE) on it, I guess because they wanted to impress us with the caliber of the applicant pool and the overall goodness of the program. But, my classmate who was made really nervous by that because he had almost the lowest scores still got accepted. I know in science, at least, there are candidates with mediocre GRE/GPA at top programs because those people have awesome research backgrounds and were well on their way to becoming experts in a topic before they applied. Meanwhile, lots of people right out of undergrad with great numbers will be rejected if they show no sign of being prepared for doing research.

If your school has a cutoff for GPA or GRE, you need to meet it. Otherwise, anything goes.

Reply

chaostheory635 October 19 2008, 00:48:34 UTC
YES!!! And research experience is pretty much the most important element of your application overall.
For programs in my field, 3.5 is pretty OK, and above a 1400 means no one will reject you based on your scores. I also know people who have gotten into great programs with less-than awesome GREs, or sub-3 GPAs. YMMV :)

Reply


rusleeping October 18 2008, 16:23:06 UTC
If your combined verbal/quantitative is >=1200, then choose a range of programs based on who is there and the research they are doing. Weight your selection to include more "top" programs.

If your combined verbal/quantitative is <=1200, then choose a range of programs based on who is there and the research they are doing. Weight your selection to include more "safety" programs.

Admissions decisions are made on a wide range of factors that will vary from department to department. There's no magic formula.

Reply


brittdreams October 18 2008, 16:40:41 UTC
Like ravenword said, it's really all about research match. You could have a 1500 and a 3.9 and not get in if your research interests don't match with any of the faculty. I got into high ranked programs without having a 1400 GRE or a 3.5 GPA. Why? I was a great match with faculty at those programs.

Reply


ladylucretia October 19 2008, 03:00:31 UTC
Somewhere the APA has a chart of average GPA and GRE for candidates in Ph.D. programs...average GRE is like 1175, average GPA was like 3.6, so I think as long as you are around those your app won't get thrown out at many schools.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up