I have three people on my thesis committee, and the paper is done--if you're curious, the chair approved of it in it's fifth draft, not that it matters. Chair says it's fine, let's defend it. Other committee member says fine, let's defend it
(
Read more... )
Comments 19
It also sounds like you have a leg up: your chair understands what's going on, and the rest of your committee is on board. A good chair will defend you from people like this--especially during the defense--and your other committee members will likely do the same. If I were you, I'd meet with my chair and talk strategy for the defense.
At this point, I'd probably stick with the nasty guy, because the fallout from "firing" him from your committee might be worse than just sucking it up and dealing with him. Plus, finding another person and catching them up might be more trouble than it's worth. And, finally, it's the chair's decision whether you pass or not, ultimately. (This is how it is in my department, but may not be the case everywhere.) She can override this crazy man since he's being, well, crazy.
Good luck!
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'm in Public Admin, and our style is APA from Purdue University's public system, a manual that I possess. I needed a clear picture of what this adviser wanted, and that example was what he gave me.
Reply
The guy wants you to suffer. I seriously doubt he cares about formatting. Most faculty don't give a crap about the format--they care about substance. Maybe he liked your paper and he felt the need to give you a hard time as kind of a hazing ritual.
Oh--have you spoken with some of his current and former students? Might be good to hear that you're not the only one, and maybe they have some ways of dealing with him.
Reply
Reply
Just out of curiousity, though...is the head of your department from a different discipline originally than your chair/advisor? Is it possible that your advisor is *not* up on APA style? Do you have a fellow grad student who you're sure is conversant with APA to look over it for you?
It *sounds* like you're being screwed by a guy with an attitude issue, but you may want to get a second opinion on your paper just to be sure. It might be that your chair/advisor is seeing great content and just handwaving style, or not even sure of it herself. (And let me hasten to say - this isn't an insult to your advisor, obviously I don't know her, but I have had full professors, even in a graduate program, who were not particularly keen on or careful about formatting.)
Reply
I just can't shake the feeling that the most likely scenario here is that you have a person with serious tone issues noticing legitimate style issues-- and style issues are minor until they're the only problem left, but then, yeah, they need to get fixed.
Maybe he's trying to say that the paper is basically done, but you keep screwing up basic style issues that are covered by APA. That's the scenario that makes the "you're wasting my time" comment make the most sense-- he's seen several revisions that were good but consistently weren't in keeping with APA style.
Reply
I'm a little concerned because upthread the OP doesn't even seem to be aware that she should be using APA style overall, and is instead relying on a university-provided mini-book, from what it sounds like, and those generally just don't have all the info you need for a thesis. :\
Reply
Yeah, I found out APA changed AGAIN this year...hence, I'm staying away from Public Admin academia after this degree!
Reply
APA just changed it's style guidelines. I'd recommend purchasing a 2009 updated APA guideline (you can get a simple one for around $18) and use this as your reference. Perhaps this Dr. Crazy Pants is not aware of the change? Or perhaps the example you followed was not updated? Either way, I think it is best to check against the most recent edition, to cover yourself. Clearly this adviser is unstable, and you want to completely cover yourself.
Good luck!!!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment