Leave a comment

Comments 13

norachan August 30 2005, 12:31:38 UTC
"[Protection from men?]" - That would be my guess though it make me wonder if they've had a history of attacks on women in the evenings. If so shouldn't that be an issue for the law enforcers/police? It reminds me of curfew.

Reply

sugarimp August 30 2005, 12:34:26 UTC
It's also the reason why a lot of women chose to wear the burqa in some countries- protection from men, rather than any religious belief.

Reply

norachan August 30 2005, 23:26:51 UTC
I still find it odd that they will limit women's working hours but not crack down on the aggressors.

To solve a problem, isn't it better to go to the root of it? So now what are the guys going to attack? Dogs? Children? Their own wives?

Are they wearing the burqa for physical protection or verbal? Perhaps they just don't want to be leered at. Hell, maybe I should try one.

ETA: Edited for grammar because I spel gud!

Reply

sugarimp August 31 2005, 08:42:26 UTC
You have to remember that this is a society that would lash a woman for getting raped- as adultery. And then to top it off, her own family would kill her for "dishonouring" the family. It's almost as if everything is the fault of the woman.

Reply


caatinga August 30 2005, 15:25:22 UTC
I know this isn't necessarily an evil plot to undermine women in the workforce, but it seems probable that this will lead to a decrease in the employability of women and thus their worth as an individual with functions outside the home ( ... )

Reply

kenosis August 30 2005, 18:45:52 UTC
I know this isn't necessarily an evil plot to undermine women in the workforce, but it seems probable that this will lead to a decrease in the employability of women and thus their worth as an individual with functions outside the home.

I agree with you completely - although I actually do believe it's probably an evil plot to artifically raise men's wages. They'd benefit from such a program, after all, because now some of their competition has been eliminated.

Reply

sugarimp August 31 2005, 08:46:12 UTC
I agree with you completely - although I actually do believe it's probably an evil plot to artifically raise men's wages. They'd benefit from such a program, after all, because now some of their competition has been eliminated.

They could just as easily go the Taliban way and stop women from working, period.

Reply

eol_nanelmoth August 30 2005, 18:46:23 UTC
f you begin with the precept that men are superior to women, doesn't that also include some kind of accountability for your actions as the one with power?

Thank you, I have been waiting for someone to say that.

Reply


kenosis August 30 2005, 18:44:00 UTC
Why not let women decide for themselves whether they think they need protection? I mean, people are usually pretty aware of how much protection they need and individuals working in rough areas. If women feel thay working in the evening is dangerous they won't do it.

Reply

norachan August 30 2005, 22:41:32 UTC
Amen

Reply

sugarimp August 31 2005, 08:47:44 UTC
Why not let women decide for themselves whether they think they need protection?

Hey now, they just recently got the right to drive! One step at a time!

Reply


turkishb August 31 2005, 02:16:26 UTC
if it's protection it's discrimination -- in the broadest sense of both terms

why not ban men from working in the evening? that'd protect the women. heck, ban the men from going out, or letting people see his face, or etc etc etc

Reply

sugarimp August 31 2005, 08:49:14 UTC
why not ban men from working in the evening?

It's easier to blame women if something goes wrong. 100 lashes for getting raped, and then her family kills her for dishonouring them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up