Hmmmmmm I like the idea, but this is such a rough sketch...how exactly did these variances in humidity cause change? What would the mechanism be, EXACTLY? You know? What was it about expansion and contraction of lakes that selected for shortened toes, fully opposed thumbs and larger brains? This looks like good science, but a vast nebula of intersecting conditions that MAY have contributed to evolution...it's so vague! Rargh...where's my aquatic ape theory?
From what I understand, the diatoms indicate a fluctuation in humidity. The fluctuation in humidity implies climatic change, which means early human would have had to migrate according to these fluctions. It's the stress of migrations- looking for new food sources/dwellings etc, that would have caused the spurts in evolution. I think.
Ohhhh OK, so we're just talking about contextualizing the spurts in development in weather/condition variations. Not sure why I couldn't see that myself. Thank yew.
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
(Great article, by the way...I'm just venting?)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment