I love the Renaissance.

Jan 24, 2009 15:08

Those of you on the flist who are early modernists, have read a lot of Shakespeare, especially if you also do a lot of context-based work or use Folger editions frequently, are probably familiar with this woodcut:


Read more... )

the elizabethans are different, talking renaissance pants

Leave a comment

Comments 36

stultiloquentia January 24 2009, 21:39:57 UTC
Ha ha! I really love my flist.

Reply


txanne January 24 2009, 21:40:04 UTC
OH MY GOD!

ouer wipt with gold twist, intersemed with knots of pearle

I KNOW HOW TO DO THAT KIND OF EMBROIDERY! Those are some *seriously* fancy-ass pants. (Hur hur hur.)

Reply


txanne January 24 2009, 21:53:14 UTC
Also, was this when "quaint" meant, uh, you know, that meaning it doesn't have any more? Because my modern mind is going hur hur quaint! hur hur greater dumpe!

Reply

angevin2 January 24 2009, 22:00:22 UTC
Well, quaint as a term for female genitalia was archaic by the 1590s, but still available for puns (references to making womens' acquaintance in Ren. drama, for instance, are bawdy jokes) and euphemisms. (OED suggests, btw, that quaint and cunning and probably also cunt -- which was an extant word as early as the fourteenth century -- are all connected to the Latin cognitus 'known').

Reply

txanne January 24 2009, 22:03:15 UTC
My brain, she is broked.

Reply


Sam, You Made the Pants Too Long executrix January 24 2009, 22:05:22 UTC
I had no idea either, although in Blakes7 fandom, there are several stories narrated by, e.g., Avon's leather pants and Avon's hooker boots.

Reply


reconditarmonia January 24 2009, 22:05:26 UTC
I wasn't scared but yet I stopped. What could those pants be there for?
What could a pair of pants at night be standing in the air for?

(This is win and crack.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up